A turbulent year for sustainable finance is set to continue this year as the return of Donald Trump as US president heralds more regional divergence on everything from fund flows to legal cases and market regulations.
Despite record-high temperatures and more extreme weather events across the planet last year, the policy response by governments still remains too slow to meet the world’s near-10-year-old goal of limiting global warming.
While regulators everywhere are gradually toughening up the rules that govern finance and companies in the real economy in an effort to cut climate-damaging carbon emissions faster, the pace of change is uneven, with the US already lagging Europe.
A turbo-charged US political backlash over environmental, social and governance-related (ESG) policies under Trump means that gap could widen even if, in many cases, the economics, companies’ near-term emissions reduction pledges and the rising costs of climate events keep the broad direction unchanged.
“We anticipate that in 2025, we’ll see a resilience for sustainable investment globally, although it’s likely that there will remain core differences between the US and Europe’s approach,” said Tom Willman, regulatory lead at sustainability tech firm Clarity AI.
“In the US, we can expect a more conservative approach, with investors prioritizing long-term risk-adjusted returns to avoid potential political or reputational risks,” Willman said.
While just over half of US executives expect new or expanded sustainability regulations this year, in Britain that figure is 60 percent and Singapore 80 percent, a survey last month of 1,600 executives by Workiva showed.
The US political reality has already spurred some US firms to curtail their climate and diversity efforts to avoid censure. In the latest sign of corporates changing tack, the biggest US banks recently left a sector coalition aimed at cutting emissions.
Legal pressure is also building on the world’s climate efforts. One in five climate litigation cases were not aligned with policies to reduce emissions, analysis last year by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment showed. The majority of these were in the US.
The regional split was evident among sustainable investment last year to the end of September, with US funds seeing clients withdraw a combined US$15.9 billion as European funds took in US$37.3 billion, data from industry tracker Morningstar showed.
Meanwhile, the number of new ESG-focused funds launched in the US fell to just seven against 189 in Europe.
Across the world, more sustainable funds were closed than launched for the first time, hit by the US backlash, increasingly tough EU rules aimed at forcing funds to evidence their sustainability credentials and market consolidation.
Demand for sustainable funds lagged the broader market in part because of mixed performance, concerns around whether some funds were as green as they purported to be, regulatory uncertainty and the ESG backlash, said Hortense Bioy, head of sustainable investing research at Morningstar Sustainalytics.
Despite an uncertain outlook given the potential for Trump to water down some ESG initiatives, for example government support for electric vehicles, many of the underlying market drivers of demand for sustainable finance, such as the need for green energy, remained, Bioy said.
Charles French, cochief investment officer at Impax Asset Management, said that despite Trump’s negative view on climate change — he has called it a hoax — companies in sectors from healthcare and industrials were eyeing climate tech solutions to cut costs.
“The era of tech-inspired transformation is not coming to an end. In many areas, it’s just getting started,” French said.
The amount of money raised through sustainable bonds also continued to rise in the Americas, up 16.9 percent, and Europe, up 10.7 percent, last year, data from LSEG showed.
Given the competing pressures, Leon Kamhi, head of responsibility at asset manager Federated Hermes, said he expected investors to “mature” and focus on the impacts being achieved in the real economy.
“For the transition to be successful, it is essential that such investments yield economic returns for both companies and investors alike,” Kamhi said.
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS