Indonesia is not taking a step back from its hardball approach to Apple. The showdown has turned into quite a spectacle, but it is unlikely the wins would be sustainable.
The tug-of-war has raged for months after Jakarta said in October last year that it would block the sale of iPhone 16s in the country because Apple had not met local investment requirements. This week, the government said it was upholding the ban and demanded further negotiations — despite greenlighting Apple’s proposal to set up an AirTag factory on the island of Batam just a day prior.
The US tech giant has remained silent about how the talks were progressing. Indonesia has not. Various leaks have claimed that the country refused to repeal the iPhone prohibition even after Apple coughed up investment offers worth US$10 million, US$100 million and, most recently, US$1 billion. Officials also reportedly altered the terms of their demands and then called for Apple senior executives to meet with Indonesian Minister of Industry Agus Gumiwang Kartasasmita. After landing in Jakarta, they were told the minister was not available.
Indonesia’s strong-arming appears to have reaped some victories. However, it has also exposed what a costly headache it is for foreign companies to navigate the regulatory red tape required to operate within its borders. This could backfire, as competition for tech investment in the region grows, and competitors such as Vietnam and Malaysia position themselves as more attractive options.
Apple accounted for just 1 percent of the Indonesian smartphone market as of the third quarter of last year, according to data from research firm Canalys. Some 80 percent of the market is dominated by devices that cost under US$200, a much lower price point than Apple’s marquee lineup. The company might have the resources to play the long game and navigate the many hoops the government is forcing it to jump through. However, others keeping tabs on the drama might be discouraged by the many hurdles, even if their lower-cost options are a better fit for the country’s market.
Still, Apple is wise to stick it out for the chance to unlock longer-term growth in the world’s fourth most-populous country that has more active cell phones than people. Shipments to the archipelago, with its young and tech-savvy population, are forecast to grow at a significantly higher clip than the global rate. As this saga drags on, Chinese premium brand Honor, a spinoff of Huawei Technologies, announced it was entering Indonesia. The cheekily timed foray into the market is not related to the iPhone 16 ban, an Honor executive has said.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s government needs to be more strategic. The looming threat of fresh tariffs on goods from China following Donald Trump’s election victory has handed it more leverage to lure Apple to further diversify its supply chains.
His administration seems to be taking issue with the fact that Apple has offered to support an AirTag factory in the country, instead of components that are directly related to the banned smartphone. It lays bare a recurring obstacle for foreign firms identified by the American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia: The gulf between the government demands regarding local production and the capabilities and infrastructure it has to support high-tech manufacturing.
Some companies have achieved compliance with the local production requirements the easy way. They have brought some packaging, charger cables, headsets and accessories production to the country. However, this does not move Indonesia up the tech value chain or support its own industry.
Policymakers should eradicate red tape and enforce regulations more clearly. They must also take strategic steps to improve infrastructure and upskill the labor force to create a sustainable high-tech manufacturing ecosystem. Vietnam and Malaysia have made focused efforts to lure investments and have seen major success, despite having consumer bases that are a fraction of the size. Indonesia only has one Apple supplier, according to its most recent list, compared to 35 in Vietnam and 19 in Malaysia.
This conflict goes beyond just iPhone sales in the country. Emerging markets such as Indonesia have become battlegrounds for the broader US-China tech rivalry. Four of the top five smartphone makers in the Southeast Asian nation are Chinese companies (and the fifth is South Korea’s Samsung Electronics).
As Chinese money and tech influence spikes, so has the nation’s popularity. More than 73 percent of citizens say they would prefer to align with Beijing over Washington if forced to choose. It should be a wake-up call for US policymakers that even as it is moving toward a breakup from Chinese tech, the rest of the world is increasingly relying on it.
For Jakarta, there is a limit to how many more victories it can eke out by holding its vast consumer base hostage from tech companies or forcing businesses into decisions that do not make economic sense. Reaching a truce with Apple would signal to the world that it is an attractive destination for firms looking for an alternative to China.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS