Indonesia is not taking a step back from its hardball approach to Apple. The showdown has turned into quite a spectacle, but it is unlikely the wins would be sustainable.
The tug-of-war has raged for months after Jakarta said in October last year that it would block the sale of iPhone 16s in the country because Apple had not met local investment requirements. This week, the government said it was upholding the ban and demanded further negotiations — despite greenlighting Apple’s proposal to set up an AirTag factory on the island of Batam just a day prior.
The US tech giant has remained silent about how the talks were progressing. Indonesia has not. Various leaks have claimed that the country refused to repeal the iPhone prohibition even after Apple coughed up investment offers worth US$10 million, US$100 million and, most recently, US$1 billion. Officials also reportedly altered the terms of their demands and then called for Apple senior executives to meet with Indonesian Minister of Industry Agus Gumiwang Kartasasmita. After landing in Jakarta, they were told the minister was not available.
Indonesia’s strong-arming appears to have reaped some victories. However, it has also exposed what a costly headache it is for foreign companies to navigate the regulatory red tape required to operate within its borders. This could backfire, as competition for tech investment in the region grows, and competitors such as Vietnam and Malaysia position themselves as more attractive options.
Apple accounted for just 1 percent of the Indonesian smartphone market as of the third quarter of last year, according to data from research firm Canalys. Some 80 percent of the market is dominated by devices that cost under US$200, a much lower price point than Apple’s marquee lineup. The company might have the resources to play the long game and navigate the many hoops the government is forcing it to jump through. However, others keeping tabs on the drama might be discouraged by the many hurdles, even if their lower-cost options are a better fit for the country’s market.
Still, Apple is wise to stick it out for the chance to unlock longer-term growth in the world’s fourth most-populous country that has more active cell phones than people. Shipments to the archipelago, with its young and tech-savvy population, are forecast to grow at a significantly higher clip than the global rate. As this saga drags on, Chinese premium brand Honor, a spinoff of Huawei Technologies, announced it was entering Indonesia. The cheekily timed foray into the market is not related to the iPhone 16 ban, an Honor executive has said.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s government needs to be more strategic. The looming threat of fresh tariffs on goods from China following Donald Trump’s election victory has handed it more leverage to lure Apple to further diversify its supply chains.
His administration seems to be taking issue with the fact that Apple has offered to support an AirTag factory in the country, instead of components that are directly related to the banned smartphone. It lays bare a recurring obstacle for foreign firms identified by the American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia: The gulf between the government demands regarding local production and the capabilities and infrastructure it has to support high-tech manufacturing.
Some companies have achieved compliance with the local production requirements the easy way. They have brought some packaging, charger cables, headsets and accessories production to the country. However, this does not move Indonesia up the tech value chain or support its own industry.
Policymakers should eradicate red tape and enforce regulations more clearly. They must also take strategic steps to improve infrastructure and upskill the labor force to create a sustainable high-tech manufacturing ecosystem. Vietnam and Malaysia have made focused efforts to lure investments and have seen major success, despite having consumer bases that are a fraction of the size. Indonesia only has one Apple supplier, according to its most recent list, compared to 35 in Vietnam and 19 in Malaysia.
This conflict goes beyond just iPhone sales in the country. Emerging markets such as Indonesia have become battlegrounds for the broader US-China tech rivalry. Four of the top five smartphone makers in the Southeast Asian nation are Chinese companies (and the fifth is South Korea’s Samsung Electronics).
As Chinese money and tech influence spikes, so has the nation’s popularity. More than 73 percent of citizens say they would prefer to align with Beijing over Washington if forced to choose. It should be a wake-up call for US policymakers that even as it is moving toward a breakup from Chinese tech, the rest of the world is increasingly relying on it.
For Jakarta, there is a limit to how many more victories it can eke out by holding its vast consumer base hostage from tech companies or forcing businesses into decisions that do not make economic sense. Reaching a truce with Apple would signal to the world that it is an attractive destination for firms looking for an alternative to China.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.