Indonesia is not taking a step back from its hardball approach to Apple. The showdown has turned into quite a spectacle, but it is unlikely the wins would be sustainable.
The tug-of-war has raged for months after Jakarta said in October last year that it would block the sale of iPhone 16s in the country because Apple had not met local investment requirements. This week, the government said it was upholding the ban and demanded further negotiations — despite greenlighting Apple’s proposal to set up an AirTag factory on the island of Batam just a day prior.
The US tech giant has remained silent about how the talks were progressing. Indonesia has not. Various leaks have claimed that the country refused to repeal the iPhone prohibition even after Apple coughed up investment offers worth US$10 million, US$100 million and, most recently, US$1 billion. Officials also reportedly altered the terms of their demands and then called for Apple senior executives to meet with Indonesian Minister of Industry Agus Gumiwang Kartasasmita. After landing in Jakarta, they were told the minister was not available.
Indonesia’s strong-arming appears to have reaped some victories. However, it has also exposed what a costly headache it is for foreign companies to navigate the regulatory red tape required to operate within its borders. This could backfire, as competition for tech investment in the region grows, and competitors such as Vietnam and Malaysia position themselves as more attractive options.
Apple accounted for just 1 percent of the Indonesian smartphone market as of the third quarter of last year, according to data from research firm Canalys. Some 80 percent of the market is dominated by devices that cost under US$200, a much lower price point than Apple’s marquee lineup. The company might have the resources to play the long game and navigate the many hoops the government is forcing it to jump through. However, others keeping tabs on the drama might be discouraged by the many hurdles, even if their lower-cost options are a better fit for the country’s market.
Still, Apple is wise to stick it out for the chance to unlock longer-term growth in the world’s fourth most-populous country that has more active cell phones than people. Shipments to the archipelago, with its young and tech-savvy population, are forecast to grow at a significantly higher clip than the global rate. As this saga drags on, Chinese premium brand Honor, a spinoff of Huawei Technologies, announced it was entering Indonesia. The cheekily timed foray into the market is not related to the iPhone 16 ban, an Honor executive has said.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s government needs to be more strategic. The looming threat of fresh tariffs on goods from China following Donald Trump’s election victory has handed it more leverage to lure Apple to further diversify its supply chains.
His administration seems to be taking issue with the fact that Apple has offered to support an AirTag factory in the country, instead of components that are directly related to the banned smartphone. It lays bare a recurring obstacle for foreign firms identified by the American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia: The gulf between the government demands regarding local production and the capabilities and infrastructure it has to support high-tech manufacturing.
Some companies have achieved compliance with the local production requirements the easy way. They have brought some packaging, charger cables, headsets and accessories production to the country. However, this does not move Indonesia up the tech value chain or support its own industry.
Policymakers should eradicate red tape and enforce regulations more clearly. They must also take strategic steps to improve infrastructure and upskill the labor force to create a sustainable high-tech manufacturing ecosystem. Vietnam and Malaysia have made focused efforts to lure investments and have seen major success, despite having consumer bases that are a fraction of the size. Indonesia only has one Apple supplier, according to its most recent list, compared to 35 in Vietnam and 19 in Malaysia.
This conflict goes beyond just iPhone sales in the country. Emerging markets such as Indonesia have become battlegrounds for the broader US-China tech rivalry. Four of the top five smartphone makers in the Southeast Asian nation are Chinese companies (and the fifth is South Korea’s Samsung Electronics).
As Chinese money and tech influence spikes, so has the nation’s popularity. More than 73 percent of citizens say they would prefer to align with Beijing over Washington if forced to choose. It should be a wake-up call for US policymakers that even as it is moving toward a breakup from Chinese tech, the rest of the world is increasingly relying on it.
For Jakarta, there is a limit to how many more victories it can eke out by holding its vast consumer base hostage from tech companies or forcing businesses into decisions that do not make economic sense. Reaching a truce with Apple would signal to the world that it is an attractive destination for firms looking for an alternative to China.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS