Measles is a childhood disease, but it is making its way through the adult population. Medical professionals are the first line of people in close contact with the disease, thus they can be easily infected. Taipei Veterans General Hospital has made it a requirement that emergency medical staff wear N95 masks and personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent transmission of the disease. The development of that situation has surprised the outside world.
The best method for preventing transmission is to receive a vaccination. The majority of frontline medical staff are between the ages of 20 and 50 years old.
Most children receive their first dose of the vaccine in early childhood, when their immune systems are not as robust — they eventually need a second dose to complete their immunization. The current wave of measles infections fall within that age group. Much younger age groups receive a second vaccination dose prior to enrollment in elementary school. When their immunity is adequate, they would not become infected.
Nearly all people who are 50 years old and older, and never received a measles immunization in their childhood gained natural immunity and for longer, often lasting until they die of old age.
There is a shortage of vaccines available for the self-paid vaccination route, but the stockpile of publicly funded doses for children procured by the Centers for Disease Control remains ample. Calls are being made urging the CDC to refer to its previous response to the measles epidemic several years ago by releasing the publicly funded measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine to various medical institutes, which could alleviate fears over vaccine access for those between the ages of 20 and 50.
That being said, frontline medical staff should be given a vaccination priority — that would be much more effective than N95 masks and PPE.
Lin Yung-zen is the director of the Taiwan Primary Care Association.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
RSS