The WHO has said all types of cigarettes, including e-cigarettes, are detrimental to health. Most e-cigarettes contain nicotine and carcinogens, which are harmful for smokers and those who are exposed to second-hand smoke.
There is no evidence that proves e-cigarettes could help smokers quit smoking. There are also safety concerns regarding the use of e-cigarettes.
Most e-cigarettes contain carcinogens and can be used to consume marijuana and drugs such as etomidate. The Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act (菸害防制法), which was promulgated last year, prohibits selling, demonstrating and using e-cigarettes.
Despite the law being in effect for almost two years, e-cigarette smokers can still be seen almost everywhere on the streets. Foreigners can also be seen smoking e-cigarettes outside the airport.
Although a law has been enacted to ban e-cigarettes, it seems that the relevant authorities are not proactive about implementing it.
I was recently at a driving training school to sign up for a course for my son. There, I saw a woman, who was probably in her 30s, smoking an e-cigarette while waiting for her turn to practice driving.
Five or six classmates, who were also waiting for their turn to practice alongside the woman, stood up and stayed away from her. Three coaches, watching her from a distance, discussed with each other, not knowing what to do.
When I saw this, I walked toward her and said loudly: “Miss, smoking e-cigarettes is illegal. The penalty ranges from NT$2,000 to NT$10,000.” Shocked, the woman put away her e-cigarette and apologized to the people surrounding her. The Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act has been in effect for almost two years. Many smokers count on luck and blatantly violate the law just because there has not been enough enforcement of the law.
Local health agencies should expand manpower to enforce the new law. This is necessary to correct bad habits and maintain people’s health.
Chen Hung-hui is a counselor.
Translated by Fion Khan
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS