In the past few decades, the invisible barrier that prevents women from ascending to senior positions in politics, business firms and other organizations has been cracked, if not shattered, in a growing number of countries.
However, another barrier — a “second glass ceiling” — to women’s advancement remains. As a result, women across sectors and countries are increasingly leaving the workforce prematurely — and not by choice.
The problem is particularly pronounced in China, where the statutory retirement age is 50 or 55 for women (depending on their occupation) and 60 for men. For years, this gender-based retirement system, originally intended to “protect” female workers from long-term heavy labor, remained unchanged, despite rising life expectancies, and gains in women’s educational and employment outcomes.
The Chinese government recently announced that, starting next year, it will gradually raise the mandatory retirement age to 63 for men and 55 or 58 for women. Such a change is long overdue, given the country’s rapidly aging population and looming pension crisis.
Unfortunately, the gender gap in retirement age persists.
Women’s early exit from the workforce has far-reaching social and economic implications. For starters, there is the loss of human capital, particularly among highly educated people. Because women in China retire earlier than men on average, despite achieving similar levels of tertiary education, the economy is underutilizing their skills.
Moreover, the second glass ceiling exacerbates the first one: Women have fewer opportunities for promotion to leadership positions, resulting in fewer role models and mentors for younger workers. For example, if a Chinese company is deciding who among its employees to promote to a leadership role, there is little incentive to select a woman in her 40s over a man of the same age, because she will retire earlier. The lack of senior women in business and government also means that decisionmaking processes at the organizational and national levels are dominated by men, to the detriment of society.
China, like many countries, is also facing a demographic crisis, which has spurred efforts to increase the birthrate.
However, motherhood often results in women — who already face shorter career spans — spending more time out of the workforce and earning less income over their lifetime. This discourages women from having children, leading to a self-defeating cycle.
Lastly, shorter career spans can reduce women’s pension benefits by preventing them from extending their working years to compensate for career interruptions from childbirth and caregiving responsibilities. Given that women live longer than men on average, this can jeopardize their long-term financial security.
Companies can and should take concrete steps to retain female workers. That could mean establishing mentorship programs that offer role models and networking opportunities for women and counteract the “old boys’ club” culture that perpetuates gender promotion and pay gaps.
Parental leave policies for men and women can help address the imbalance in caregiving responsibilities. Equally important is tackling age discrimination in hiring and retention, and offering support to women experiencing menopause and other health issues that often lead them to give up working.
The public sector must implement similar measures. For example, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and its National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences have increased the age limit for women applying to youth grant programs to 40 from 35. This will provide more equal opportunities for female researchers and academics with children.
However, in China, the most consequential change that the government could make would be to end its gender-specific mandatory retirement policy. No longer forcing women to leave the workforce before men would be a step toward equality and could even increase demand for childcare and eldercare.
While helping women reach leadership roles remains crucial to advancing gender equality, political and business leaders must also focus on creating the conditions that allow female workers to remain productive in their fields for as long as they want. Many countries, including the US, Canada and Japan, have moved away from mandatory retirement ages, and those that still use them tend not to have different cutoffs for men and women (Russia is one of the few exceptions).
A flexible retirement system would put a large crack in China’s second glass ceiling by allowing women to realize their full professional potential.
Wang Xianghong (王湘紅) is a professor in the School of Economics at Renmin University of China.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
RSS