On May 27, 2022, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — still a mayoral candidate at the time — suggested three prerequisites for the continuation of the Shanghai-Taipei Twin City Forum: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could no longer harass Taiwan, must show goodwill toward the nation, and must acknowledge that Taiwan and China are equals.
Just two-and-a-half years later, these commitments have been abandoned completely. This has led to a loss of trust in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) principles and ability to handle cross-strait relations.
The first prerequisite, that the CCP can no longer harass Taiwan, was broken at the very start. Not only have the CCP’s constant military drills failed to cease or even diminish, but now even government vessels, China Coast Guard ships and surveillance balloons have been deployed. China has also surrounded Taiwan in a posture indicating that military exercises are imminent. Even while the KMT and Chiang bury their heads in the sand, ignoring the CCP’s aggression, they cannot hide the reality that the rest of the international community is watching carefully, warning China not to take advantage of the situation or cause trouble.
The second prerequisite of showing goodwill toward Taiwan has also completely failed. Prior to the forum, there have been issues with a Chinese university group invited by the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation and the Cross-Strait CEO Summit. The former used demeaning and offensive language — such as referring to Taiwan’s baseball team as “China, Taipei” and a visit to Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Girls’ High School being headlined as “a monk entering the den of spider demons” — during their trip in Taiwan. The latter openly encouraged Taiwanese businesses to “acknowledge the one China principle and oppose Taiwanese independence” while subtly encouraging Taiwan to “join the red supply chain.” Furthermore, from APEC to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and from Paraguay to Lithuania, China’s continued suppression of Taiwan’s diplomacy has sparked international outrage. Just how far are Chiang and the KMT willing to take their “genius” interpretations of China’s malice as “goodwill”?
The third prerequisite has been reduced to nothing more than a joke. Shanghai’s other international “sister cities,” such as New York, Marseille, Barcelona and Istanbul, always possess a “mayor-to-mayor” relationship. However, the Chiang administration’s six months of groveling to China only resulted in a visit from Shanghai Vice Mayor Hua Yuan (華源) — the youngest in the city’s history. Chiang even insists on personally greeting Hua upon his arrival.
According to media reports, the Taipei City Government also requested that China refrain from sending out People’s Liberation Army aircraft or vessels during the forum, which Beijing refused.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office also said that referring to Taiwan’s baseball team as the “China, Taipei” team was completely fine.
There is no end to China’s belittling — it lacks even a semblance of equality. Chiang, of all people, should speak up in protest of this — so why has he suddenly gone silent?
Just one forum is enough to expose the hypocrisy and fragility of the KMT’s so-called cross-strait prerequisites of “equality, goodwill and reciprocity.” In the face of the CCP’s uninterrupted military harassment of Taiwan and Shanghai’s condescension toward Chiang, Taiwanese have seen for themselves the KMT’s pitiful obsequiousness. As China continues to exploit, humiliate and repeatedly slap the KMT’s face, party intellectuals such as Chiang and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have simply turned their heads to allow the CCP to hit the other side. If this goes on, Taiwan would never gain respect from China or achieve true peace — instead, the KMT would continue to bring shame upon itself and the country.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS