On May 27, 2022, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — still a mayoral candidate at the time — suggested three prerequisites for the continuation of the Shanghai-Taipei Twin City Forum: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could no longer harass Taiwan, must show goodwill toward the nation, and must acknowledge that Taiwan and China are equals.
Just two-and-a-half years later, these commitments have been abandoned completely. This has led to a loss of trust in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) principles and ability to handle cross-strait relations.
The first prerequisite, that the CCP can no longer harass Taiwan, was broken at the very start. Not only have the CCP’s constant military drills failed to cease or even diminish, but now even government vessels, China Coast Guard ships and surveillance balloons have been deployed. China has also surrounded Taiwan in a posture indicating that military exercises are imminent. Even while the KMT and Chiang bury their heads in the sand, ignoring the CCP’s aggression, they cannot hide the reality that the rest of the international community is watching carefully, warning China not to take advantage of the situation or cause trouble.
The second prerequisite of showing goodwill toward Taiwan has also completely failed. Prior to the forum, there have been issues with a Chinese university group invited by the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation and the Cross-Strait CEO Summit. The former used demeaning and offensive language — such as referring to Taiwan’s baseball team as “China, Taipei” and a visit to Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Girls’ High School being headlined as “a monk entering the den of spider demons” — during their trip in Taiwan. The latter openly encouraged Taiwanese businesses to “acknowledge the one China principle and oppose Taiwanese independence” while subtly encouraging Taiwan to “join the red supply chain.” Furthermore, from APEC to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and from Paraguay to Lithuania, China’s continued suppression of Taiwan’s diplomacy has sparked international outrage. Just how far are Chiang and the KMT willing to take their “genius” interpretations of China’s malice as “goodwill”?
The third prerequisite has been reduced to nothing more than a joke. Shanghai’s other international “sister cities,” such as New York, Marseille, Barcelona and Istanbul, always possess a “mayor-to-mayor” relationship. However, the Chiang administration’s six months of groveling to China only resulted in a visit from Shanghai Vice Mayor Hua Yuan (華源) — the youngest in the city’s history. Chiang even insists on personally greeting Hua upon his arrival.
According to media reports, the Taipei City Government also requested that China refrain from sending out People’s Liberation Army aircraft or vessels during the forum, which Beijing refused.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office also said that referring to Taiwan’s baseball team as the “China, Taipei” team was completely fine.
There is no end to China’s belittling — it lacks even a semblance of equality. Chiang, of all people, should speak up in protest of this — so why has he suddenly gone silent?
Just one forum is enough to expose the hypocrisy and fragility of the KMT’s so-called cross-strait prerequisites of “equality, goodwill and reciprocity.” In the face of the CCP’s uninterrupted military harassment of Taiwan and Shanghai’s condescension toward Chiang, Taiwanese have seen for themselves the KMT’s pitiful obsequiousness. As China continues to exploit, humiliate and repeatedly slap the KMT’s face, party intellectuals such as Chiang and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have simply turned their heads to allow the CCP to hit the other side. If this goes on, Taiwan would never gain respect from China or achieve true peace — instead, the KMT would continue to bring shame upon itself and the country.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS