KMT’s ‘wine’ farce
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative whip Fu Kun-chi’s former chief of staff in Hualien City, Chiang Pang-fa (蔣邦法), said during a recent city council session that “unification with China is inevitable.”
Chiang apparently thinks that China should not be provoked, that Taiwan needs to “behave” and that “one should drink sweet wine in a toast rather than being forced to drink bitter wine as a penalty.”
It is farcical that “China’s little echoes” in the KMT — including Fu — have so little concern about saying Taiwanese should give China “respect.”
Mainstream opinion is that “neither side of the Taiwan Strait is subservient to the other” and that “Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation.” The ratio of those who support joining China is vanishingly small, already a tiny minority of the nation’s populace.
Chiang’s comment that “unification is inevitable” is hogwash.
Taiwan’s democratic freedoms are renowned throughout the world. Nobody is going out of their way to annoy China, but China treats Taiwan as if it were a younger sibling, constantly threatening it.
The euphemism about “drinking sweet wine” shows that Chiang is completely on China’s side and it was a subtle threat against the homeland. He seems to be an accomplice to China’s verbal and military threats, and posturing. What he does not seem to realize is that Taiwan and China are adversaries in terms of political and military affairs, and China is the one that started it.
Chiang grew up in Taiwan, ate Taiwanese rice and was educated here. He won re-election through the democratic mechanism by Taiwanese as a representative of a Taiwanese city. His salary comes from the Taiwanese electorate.
Are there no regulations to punish him for brazenly carrying China’s water, subtly threatening the homeland and trying to sell Taiwanese on “obedience” to China while portraying himself as a benevolent actor while selling Taiwan out?
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
RSS