Taiwan’s export orders are on track to return to growth this year, driven mainly by the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, snapping two years of declines. Orders are expected to expand up to 4.3 percent annually to about US$539.35 billion this year amid thriving demand for AI chips and AI servers, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
However, the focus on the technology sector and a capricious external environment spell trouble for this key economic indicator.
Taiwan is heavily reliant on the technology sector for growth, even though traditional sectors such as basic metals, machinery equipment and chemical products have emerged from a deep slump. About 68 percent of the nation’s export orders in the first 10 months of this year, valued at US$554.5 billion, came from electronic products, chips primarily, and information and communication technology (ICT) devices. In 2014, ICT and electronic products made up about 52 percent of overall export orders, ministry data showed.
Last month, the US accounted for more than 30 percent of ICT product orders and more than 40 percent of electronic products orders, the data showed. That means any trade policy changes that the incoming administration of US president-elect Donald Trump introduces would affect Taiwan.
Manufacturers and exporters are bracing for protectionist trade policies under Trump’s “make America great again” ideals, among which is to boost US manufacturing by imposing tariffs of at least 10 percent on foreign companies, depending on the country.
To address the issue, local manufacturers are adopting an agile stance and are cautiously managing their overseas production sites. Any setbacks in supply chain management might result in losses in new orders, which would have a knock-on effect on Taiwan’s economy.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, the world’s biggest electronics manufacturer, last week said that it planned to expand production capacity of AI servers based on Nvidia Corp’s Blackwell chips in Taiwan, the US and Mexico to cope with rising demand. Another Nvidia server supplier, Wistron Corp, also said it did not rule out making servers in the US, “if it is necessary.” Wistron is boosting capacity at its Mexico factory to cope with rapid increases in orders.
For Taiwan’s traditional sectors, it is a different story. Companies are struggling to get out of the woods, given sluggish demand from China, the biggest export destination for local producers of chemical, petrochemical and machinery products.
Moreover, Chinese rivals are nibbling away at Taiwan’s — and everyone else’s — share of the global market by exporting as much as possible at lower prices amid poor domestic demand.
Export orders for rubber, chemical and machinery products made in Taiwan have fallen well behind technology products, the ministry data showed.
Although Beijing has launched economic stimulus packages, it is unclear whether they would revive its economy, so Taiwanese firms are seeking to diversify their markets, including by expanding their presence in the US, Southeast Asia and Europe, the ministry said.
However, it would take time to make significant progress, as local firms do not benefit from lower tariffs as global peers do in the absence of free trade pacts between Taiwan and many other countries.
With technology companies facing rising uncertainty as Trump prepares to re-enter the White House amid a slow recovery in traditional sectors, Taiwan’s economy faces a bumpy road. As most companies in the traditional sectors are small or medium-sized, they need more government aid and resources to deal with the situation. The government also needs to ponder how to rebalance the economy.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase