In recent years, the military has seen a significant increase in instances of espionage, disciplinary infringements and other cases harmful to its image.
The unique nature of military assignments comes with far more pressure than a normal job. However, encouraging positive interpersonal interactions that promote solidarity is the most effective method for risk reduction.
The leadership styles of military officers directly influence feelings of unity and solidarity among soldiers.
Solidarity can create relationships akin to brotherhood, allowing soldiers in a unit to share aspirations and hardships. This sense of camaraderie can bring comfort despite the difficulty of some military assignments. Although the military emphasizes a hierarchical system of obedience — where every command is followed without question — officers should also work to establish close relationships with fellow soldiers. More than mere obedience, officers’ displays of genuine concern for their fellow soldiers is the best way to guarantee high morale.
The entire military must work together to establish solidarity and high morale across all ranks, along with a strong sense of shared identity within the military — this is the best way to build highly effective, battle-ready forces.
Soldiers rarely have opportunities for team-building activities or group trips. Although recreational activities are often held within barracks, they typically consist of superficial forms of entertainment and do nothing to build motivation or solidarity.
The military could use behavioral science techniques used by many businesses to foster sympathy and a shared sense of purpose within an organization, thereby enhancing work efficiency to achieve organizational goals. That approach could not only improve soldiers’ interpersonal skills, but could also promote an atmosphere of solidarity within a unit.
The confidential nature of military assignments has led to a disconnect between the military and the outside world. For this reason, many soldiers want nothing more than to relax when they have time off, which has led to many disciplinary incidents.
The military should try its best to create more opportunities for soldiers’ families to become involved in its environment.
The more family members become familiar with the military environment, the better they can understand the challenges their loved ones face. Deeper understanding from family members could help soldiers feel more relaxed, which could mitigate risks and encourage the successful completion of assignments.
In summary, risk management in the military should focus on improving the quality of leadership of military officers, cultivating team dynamics within units and allowing family members to integrate with the military environment.
Together, these measures can create strong feelings of solidarity and improve morale across all ranks, foster a sense of joint identity and build a highly effective, battle-ready military force.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS