The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) in a statement on Tuesday reiterated Taiwan’s claims over the islands and features in the South China Sea, and called for disputes to be resolved through dialogue.
The statement came in response to assertions by the Philippines and China of their own claims in the area, and ongoing skirmishes between the countries, which MOFA said were “escalating regional tensions and potentially jeopardizing regional peace and stability.”
Taiwan claims a large swath of the South China Sea inside of a U-shaped “eleven-dash line,” which includes the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島), the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) and Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島), as well as several other disputed features. Those claims include the only two that are administered by Taiwan: Pratas Island and Itu Aba (Taiping Island, 太平島).
Taiwan is unlikely to rescind those claims, but pursuing those claims would be unrealistic and unproductive for a number of reasons, not least of which is that the eleven-dash line contradicts the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
UNCLOS stipulates that a coastal state can claim a territorial sea that extends up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline of its shore. Even if Taiwan were to enjoy sovereignty over every habitable feature in the South China Sea, the areas between those features would remain international waters. China is a signatory to UNCLOS, but flouts its terms, and has disregarded The Hague’s 2016 arbitral tribunal’s adjudication of the Philippines’ case against it on sovereignty in the area.
Taiwan, despite not being a member state, follows UN conventions including UNCLOS, because it hopes to be seen as a contributing member of the global community that adheres to international order. It follows that Taiwan has more to gain by not pressing its neighbors on claims in the area. While Taiwan should continue to assert its sovereignty over Pratas Island and Itu Aba, but it could work with the Philippines and other regional partners in countering Chinese aggression.
China has frequently obstructed Philippine vessels, including those supplying sailors stationed at Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙), and fishers operating in waters near disputed features.
Taiwanese assistance to Philippine fishers would not necessarily equate to recognizing the Philippines’ claims, but it would demonstrate Taiwan’s commitment to resolving territorial disputes through dialogue. Conversely, if China is allowed to bully others with impunity, it would embolden Beijing to seize more features and drive out other claimants, effectively handing over control of the region to China. Such a scenario would be disastrous for global shipping, much of which passes through the South China Sea. It would also afford China an uncontested projection of power, making it a greater threat to the US and its allies in the region.
While China is unlikely to come to the table for talks on resolving territorial disputes — since it views its own claims as uncontestable — Taiwan and the US could at least demonstrate good faith by offering to host such talks. A regional alliance led by Taiwan, the US and Japan, and including other South China Sea claimants, could potentially keep the China Coast Guard at bay through regular joint patrols.
The Republic of China is the progenitor of the current state of territorial disputes in the South China Sea, which began when Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) published an official map featuring the eleven-dash line in 1947. The Chinese Communist Party revised those claims into a “nine-dash line” to avoid conflict with Vietnam, but it continues to make many of the same claims that Chiang laid out. This is one reason why Taiwan could play an important role in mediating tensions today.
Taiwan must work with the US and other regional partners to mitigate conflict in the South China Sea, cooperate on protecting freedom of navigation through its waters and seek dialogue on resolving territorial disputes.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS