Pianist Evgeny Kissin is scheduled to perform in Taiwan tomorrow and on Tuesday next week. Tickets have long ago sold out, as did those for two recitals at New York’s Carnegie Hall in late May.
After Taipei, Kissin was scheduled to perform in Hong Kong. Less than a month before the Hong Kong concert, the organizer announced it was canceled.
Born in Russia to Jewish parents, Kissin first came to international fame as a child prodigy.
The live recording of his performance of Chopin’s two concertos in Moscow’s Tchaikovsky Concert Hall when he was 12 became legendary in classical music history.
The last time Herbert von Karajan, probably the world’s best-known conductor and one of the most powerful figures in classical music, conducted the Berlin Philharmonic’s New Year’s Eve concert before his death was partnered with Kissin when he was 17.
Von Karajan’s daughter recalled that she had only seen her father cry once. It was when Kissin met him in Salzburg, Austria, for a private audition and his performance brought the maestro to tears.
The former music prodigy is now in his prime 40 years later.
This is the 53-year-old Kissin’s seventh visit to Taiwan.
According to Kissin’s official Web site, he will go directly to South Korea after leaving Taiwan, followed by six concerts in Japan. The performance schedule is unrelenting and Hong Kong is the only stop that has been canceled.
Obviously, the cancelation was not due to health reasons, but has to do with Kissin’s unequivocal support for Ukraine.
Despite being commonly viewed as a great successor of the Russian piano school and being the youngest-ever winner of the Triumph Award — one of the highest cultural honors to be awarded in the Russian Federation — for his outstanding contribution to Russia’s culture, Kissin deeply suffered from the experience of being bullied in his childhood as a Jew.
After the Russian invasion of Ukraine, he resolutely severed ties with the Russian authorities. Kissin complained bitterly: “Russia is one of the most anti-Semitic countries in the world.”
Refusing to recognize Russia as his motherland, he declared: “I don’t have a drop of Russian blood in me.”
Kissin was one of the first artists to stand up and denounce Russian President Vladimir Putin. For more than two years, he has spared no effort in calling on the Western world to help Ukraine and has never been afraid to take a stand.
In retaliation, in July, the Russian government named Kissin a “foreign agent,” which is akin to labeling him a foreign spy. This can be regarded as a medal of honor certified by the Moscow authorities.
Just one day before Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Putin warmly shook hands at the BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, the Hong Kong government self-censored and announced the cancelation of Kissin’s recital. This is another piece of clear evidence that the Hong Kong government has become a powerful servant of the Beijing authorities, trying to eliminate anything awkward between China and Russia on the “friendly” occasion of the summit.
Being made an honorary doctor of letters by the University of Hong Kong in 2009, it is ironic that Kissin is now banned from the territory. It is not only a loss for Hong Kong music fans, but also a tragedy for the territory.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS