The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) announcement of a possible death penalty for Taiwanese “separatists” marks a disturbing escalation in its approach to cross-strait relations. This move undermines regional stability, poses a significant threat to peace in the Taiwan Strait and is a contradiction of its own stated goal of peaceful reunification.
The judicial guidelines, which took effect on June 21, allow for severe punishments, including the death penalty, for individuals China believes to be “die-hard” Taiwan independence supporters. These measures target those who form “secessionist organizations” or direct others to “carry out activities that split the state or undermine unity of the country.”
The guidelines specify crimes such as promoting Taiwan’s entry into international organizations where statehood is a requirement, and using one’s job or influence to “misrepresent or falsify the fact that Taiwan is part of China.” The guidelines include a broad clause for “other acts that seek to separate Taiwan from China,” which could be widely interpreted.
These guidelines potentially apply to a wide range of actions related to Taiwan’s international status and self-governance. Anyone engaging in activities that Beijing considers supportive of Taiwan’s independence could be targeted. Those deemed by PRC authorities as “ringleaders” might face severe penalties, including death sentences. The risk extends worldwide, as Beijing can attempt to extradite accused individuals from countries that have extradition agreements with China.
In recent years, China has enacted several laws to strengthen its surveillance and national security legal framework. The new judicial guidelines represent its latest move, which has been thinly veiled as a protective measure. In fact, it is escalating tensions and creating a chilling effect worldwide. Through these actions, China is further isolating itself from the international community.
In the past year alone, 15 Taiwanese have been detained or charged with crimes after entering China, while 51 have been interrogated by border officers, with the number increasing. Threats from national security laws and the latest judicial guidance not only jeopardize the lives and freedom of Taiwanese, but also pose a significant risk to peace in the Taiwan Strait and the broader Indo-Pacific region.
On Sept. 5, the Taiwanese government said that Yang Chih-yuan (楊智淵), a Taiwanese activist, had been sentenced to nine years in prison by a court in the eastern Chinese city of Wenzhou for “separatism.” This unprecedented sentence prompted the Mainland Affairs Council to warn Taiwanese about the dangers of traveling across the strait. This case clearly demonstrates the real and immediate threat China’s new judicial guidelines pose.
As a cochair of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus, I joined my fellow cochairs in issuing a statement strongly condemning the new guidelines. We emphasized that “these guidelines will have a severe chilling effect on exchanges with China and represent a destabilizing policy approach to cross-Strait relations.”
China should engage in meaningful dialogue with Taiwan rather than resorting to dangerous and provocative threats, which would not achieve a peaceful resolution to cross-strait differences. The US Department of State has also expressed concern regarding China’s intentions to extraterritorially apply PRC law and intimidate people from speaking their mind about the situation across the strait.
Maintaining dialogue with both Beijing and Taipei is critical to de-escalating tensions. As a member of the first congressional delegation to visit Taiwan after the January elections, I met with President William Lai (賴清德), followed by a meeting a few months later with representatives from the Chinese National People’s Congress in Washington.
With these interactions, I have emphasized the US’ unwavering commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Maintaining open dialogue is critical to reduce the risk of misperceptions from veering into conflict.
China’s threat to impose the death penalty on Taiwan “separatists” is a dangerous and unacceptable escalation that threatens the peaceful dialogue required for the successful resolution of cross-strait issues. It is not just the death penalty, but the guidelines as a whole that pose a significant risk to regional stability.
I will continue to oppose any PRC attempts to isolate or threaten Taiwan. I urge the international community to condemn these actions and to support efforts to maintain cross-strait peace and stability.
US Congressman Ami Bera is a senior member of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee and cochair of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS