All students across the globe want to reach academic success and apply their knowledge in their lives and jobs. After reading Yang Mien-chieh and Jonathan Chin’s article titled “2,527 students enroll in MOE’s AI programs,” which was published on the Taipei Times’ page 3 on Friday last week, and the research article Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy by researchers Funda Nayir, Tamer Sari and Aras Bozkurt, I have come to the conclusion that generative artificial intelligence (AI) is quite useful when it comes to helping students in their learning endeavors. Nevertheless, every tool that human beings have created comes with threats and opportunities.
The researchers said that generative AI raises worries that automation would result in job losses and difficulties such as incorrect judgements and prejudices. Nevertheless, generative AI might be a handy tool when it is used for educational purposes under the guidance of a teacher.
Teachers who are not yet familiar with generative AI tools can still show the basic steps to their students. As National Changhua Senior High School has opened a class teaching students how to use generative AI to conduct research and prepare for a debate, with an emphasis on developing the ability to critically assess information produced by algorithms, other teachers can follow suit and encourage their students to conduct research using AI. Using AI tools is not about students becoming lazy by giving them all the answers on a silver plate. On the contrary, it is about helping students finding new and original information.
The advantages of using generative AI are that students would find out that writing a research article is not as time consuming nor painstaking anymore, and that they can save time and do other important duties. That is to say, teachers need to show their students that generative AI tools can facilitate the research process and scaffold learning by doing more in-depth investigations to verify information and sources if needed.
According to educator Edgar Dale’s Cone of Experience, students need to have learning experiences that simulate “doing the real thing” and “are more effective than traditional methodologies.” Therefore, students who decide to enroll in a class need to show industriousness, which is a cornerstone of the Pyramid of Success. Industriousness consists of hard work and planning to reach a goal, both of which are needed for positive performance behavior. Intentness also consists of being determined and persistent. When students are using their “strengths,” they tend to become alive, and more communicative and excited about what they are doing.
When implemented properly, AI could serve as a beneficial assistive technology in education, allowing students to achieve their full potential or easing many educational processes.
David Blasco is a Ling Tung University assistant professor.
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial
RSS