Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year.
A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states.
To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions.
According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s population rapidly increased in the 1980s from about 2.27 million to a record high of nearly 2.72 million in 1990. The city’s population then fell slightly, but remained steady at about 2.6 million for more than two decades.
However, it has steadily declined since 2016, dropping to about 2.48 million — below the 2.5 million threshold — in 2022, which reduced the city’s deputy mayors from three to two when Chiang took office in December of that year.
Taipei’s population rose slightly above 2.5 million last year, which experts said was mainly due to Taiwanese living abroad returning to the city to register their household registration after the national borders reopened with the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.
While Chiang has not appointed a third deputy mayor, the city’s population has been declining again this year — to 2,502,093 by the end of last month — and is expected to fall below 2.5 million by the end of this month.
Chiang said birth and parenting-friendly policies contributed to the increase of about 1,500 newborns last year and about 775 in the first eight months of this year.
However, despite the increasing number of newborns, the number of people moving out of the city exceeded that of those moving into it, in each month of this year, with a total loss of 7,197 city residents in the first eight months of this year, city government data showed.
Experts, government officials and members of the public have pointed to Taipei’s high housing prices and high cost of living, as well as convenient public transportation to the city, as contributing to many young people preferring to live in nearby New Taipei City, Taoyuan or Keelung and commute to Taipei.
An analysis of people flow data using anonymized mobile network data, released by the Ministry of the Interior on Friday, seems to support their assumptions.
It showed that about one-quarter (25.2 percent) of the day-time population in Taipei return and stay in New Taipei City in the evening, while 2 percent return to Taoyuan and 1.4 percent return to Keelung.
Data from the global crowd-sourced database Numbeo showed that the property price-to-income ratio in Taipei last year was 28.7, higher than Singapore at 15.7 and Japan at 9.8.
Data compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics showed that Taipei’s average household spending last year was about NT$1.09 million (US$34,103), the highest of the six special municipalities.
As several factors contributing to the city’s falling population have been identified, the government should not only implement short-term policies to help arrest the decline such as by providing childcare subsidies and prioritizing young couples for social housing, but also come up with policies to address long-term problems such as the housing crisis and wage stagnation, which discourages many young people from settling down and starting a family in Taipei.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS