During a televised interview with ERA TV earlier this month, President William Lai (賴清德) said that China wants to annex Taiwan not for the sake of territorial integrity, but for hegemony. Otherwise, China should take back the territory it ceded to Russia in the Treaty of Aigun, especially now that Russia is in its “weakest state.”
Despite Lai’s statement being reported on and republished by international media, China did not dare to respond directly. It was instead a spokesperson from the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs who provided a response, saying that the 2001 Sino-Russian Treaty of Friendship and the Supplementary Agreement on the Eastern Section of the China-Russia Boundary Line between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation were the final solutions to the border disputes between the two countries.
Russia has conducted large-scale seizures of Chinese territory on multiple occasions. In 1858, the Treaty of Aigun led to Russia’s annexation of more than 600,000km2 of Chinese territory north of the Heilongjiang River and south of the Greater Khingan Range, also known as the Da Hing-gan Range (大興安嶺).
In 1860, the Convention of Peking (中俄北京條約) ceded 400,000km2 of Chinese territory east of the Ussuri River in northeastern China to Russia. In 1864, the Treaty of Tarbagatai, also known as the Treaty of Chuguchak, handed 440,000km2 of Chinese territory in the northwest — including areas east and south of Lake Balkhash — over to Russia. In 1881, the Treaty of Saint Petersburg, also known as the Treaty of Ili, and several subsequent border demarcation agreements resulted in China ceding about 70,000km2 of land, including areas west of the Korgas River in the northwest and east of the Zhaishan Naoer region in northern Xinjiang Province.
It is especially worth noting that following the October Revolution of 1917, the Soviet Union’s deputy people’s commissar for foreign affairs Lev Karakhan issued his first manifesto in 1919, stating that all lands acquired through aggression during the reign of the Russian Empire in China, Manchuria, and elsewhere were to be relinquished.
The following year, the second version of the manifesto reiterated that all agreements concluded by the former Russian Empire with China that involved territorial claims, concessions, or privileges would be declared null and void.
The Soviet government also promised to return all lands and properties seized by the former Russian Empire. Additionally, all Russian assets appropriated from China would be permanently returned to China without remuneration.
At the time the manifesto was published, China was in a state of widespread disorder and thus had no time to deal with the Soviet Union. Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), a founder of the Republic of China, not only failed to take back the lost territory, he even allowed the Soviet Union’s Red Army to enter and garrison Mongolia in exchange for assistance in establishing the Whampoa Military Academy.
During the Sino-Soviet Conflict of 1929, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) did nothing to assist the ROC in repealing the Soviet Union’s privileges. It went so far as to come up with its own slogan about defending the Soviet Union and staged an armed rebellion.
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) was established in 1949. The following year, CCP leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and former Soviet leader Joseph Stalin signed the Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance. After that, Mao no longer dared to bring up territorial disputes.
Initially, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) did not recognize the unequal treaties when he came to power. However, after signing the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 1984 and regaining control of Hong Kong, he engaged in negotiations with the Soviet Union.
In 1991, CCP head Jiang Zemin (江澤民), who later became president in 1993, visited the Soviet Union and the two countries signed the Sino-Soviet Border Agreement (中蘇國界東段協定), which established a joint committee to settle border demarcation. In 2005, then Chinese foreign minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星) and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov signed the Certificate for the Exchange of the Instrument of Ratification for the Supplementary Agreement on the Eastern Section of the China-Russia Boundary Line between the PRC and the Russian Federation in Vladivostok, which delimited more than 4,000km of boundary lines between the two countries.
On Tuesday last week, Chinese Vice President Han Zheng (韓正) attended Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok. During his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Han said he was very pleased to be invited to the city, noting that “Vladivostok” means “Ruler of the East” in Russian. Han’s use of the Russian name rather than the Chinese was likely an attempt at pandering. It further made clear that China remains under the heel of its “big brother” Russia. This behavior following Lai’s comments highlights the CCP’s brazen attitude and lack of boundaries, leading some in China to refer to the CCP as “yellow Russians” (黃俄).
At the next news conference of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, Taiwanese reporters should raise this territorial issue and demand a direct response.
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS