The Chinese government’s sensitivity toward the Dalai Lama is a complex issue rooted in historical, political and cultural factors. Understanding this sensitivity requires delving into the intricate relationship between China and Tibet, as well as the broader implications of the Dalai Lama’s influence.
The Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, fled Tibet in 1959 following a failed uprising against Chinese rule. Since then, he has lived in exile in India, continuing to advocate for the rights and autonomy of the Tibetan people.
Despite his public stance of seeking genuine autonomy rather than full independence for Tibet, the Chinese government views him as a significant political threat. His influence and the support he garners for Tibetan autonomy challenge China’s sovereignty over Tibet, a region it considers an integral part of its territory.
One of the most unique aspects of the Dalai Lama’s role is the process of reincarnation. The Chinese government has expressed a strong desire to control the selection of the next Dalai Lama, ensuring that the successor aligns with their political interests.
This move is part of a broader strategy to maintain control over Tibetan Buddhism and prevent any separatist movements. By controlling the reincarnation process, China aims to diminish the Dalai Lama’s influence and integrate Tibetan Buddhism more closely with the state.
The Dalai Lama’s global recognition as a symbol of peace and human rights often leads to diplomatic tensions between China and other countries. His meetings with foreign leaders and his international advocacy for Tibetan rights are perceived by China as attempts to undermine its sovereignty and territorial integrity. These interactions can strain China’s diplomatic relations, leading to strong reactions from the Chinese government whenever the Dalai Lama is given a platform on the global stage.
The Dalai Lama holds immense cultural and religious significance for Tibetans and Buddhists worldwide. His teachings and leadership are deeply revered, making him a powerful figure beyond the political realm.
The Chinese government’s efforts to control religious practices and institutions in Tibet are part of a broader campaign to assimilate Tibetan culture into the dominant Han Chinese culture. The Dalai Lama’s influence represents a challenge to these efforts, as he embodies the preservation of Tibetan identity and religious freedom.
The Chinese government’s sensitivity toward the Dalai Lama is driven by a combination of historical grievances, political calculations and cultural considerations. The Dalai Lama’s enduring influence and his advocacy for Tibetan rights continue to pose a challenge to China’s authority over Tibet.
As long as the Dalai Lama remains a prominent figure on the global stage, the Chinese government’s sensitivity toward his activities is likely to persist.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial to comprehending the broader geopolitical landscape and the ongoing struggle for Tibetan autonomy and cultural preservation.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS