The Cabinet last week passed a four-year national development plan which aims to achieve average GDP growth of between 2.8 percent and 3.6 percent from next year to 2028 and increase GDP per capita from US$39,105 to US$42,787 over the same period.
The National Development Council said the government was confident of achieving the goal.
Taiwan could even catch up with Israel — which ranks 14th globally with a GDP per capita of US$55,535 — after surpassing the GDP per capita of Japan and South Korea, it said.
The most critical factors affecting GDP per capita are, assuming that the population remains unchanged, a country’s currency exchange rate and economic growth rate. The persistent rise in Taiwan’s GDP per capita in recent years reflects steady growth in the country’s economy and the local currency better maintaining its value in US dollar terms when compared with other countries.
For Taiwan to continue its growth and maintain its advantage over other regional economies, the country must maintain strong economic fundamentals and avoid uncertainties that might trigger capital flight and negatively affect exchange rates and economic growth.
The nation must also take advantage of technological innovations to increase productivity in traditional and service industries.
It should also achieve net zero carbon emissions to enhance the nation’s competitiveness.
The country’s economic success is built upon the thriving semiconductor industry, which feeds an insatiable global market for the most advanced chips for cars, 5G telecoms, smart devices and artificial intelligence applications.
Most of Taiwan’s export growth is from the information and communications technology (ICT) sector, with little from textiles, machinery, agriculture or other traditional manufacturing and service sectors.
While workers in the ICT industries have received increasing salaries and big year-end bonuses, their peers in other industries continue to face wage stagnation, which has persisted since 2000.
Those working in non-ICT jobs have little reason to celebrate the news that Taiwan’s GDP per capita might surpass that of Japan and South Korea.
This uneven industrial development has resulted in a few tech firms taking center stage in the economy, while the traditional manufacturing and services sectors (excluding financial firms) face continued income inequality due to limited wage growth.
In addition to raising the minimum wage, the government must assist non-tech manufacturing and service sectors in digital transformation and production upgrades, as combined they account for nearly 87 percent of the nation’s employment.
The growth in the nation’s GDP per capita is not too much of a cause for celebration, given that the fruits of the increase have been so unequally distributed among workers. The major beneficiaries have been shareholders.
According to the latest government statistics, the total labor compensation has consistently grown since 2012, but the ratio of labor compensation to GDP dropped from 45.77 percent in 2012 to 43.07 percent in 2021, a new low, while the ratio of corporate profits to GDP increased from 31.82 percent in 2012 to 36.41 percent in 2021, a new high.
Amid changes in the industrial structure, production model and employment dynamics, shareholders’ share of the benefits of Taiwan’s economic growth has gradually increased over the past 10 years or so, while workers’ share has steadily decreased.
Therefore, the government must look beyond the seemingly satisfying GDP statistics and produce policy incentives which encourage corporations to share more of their profits with workers.
This would help lessen the public’s growing sense of relative deprivation.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS