The Cabinet last week passed a four-year national development plan which aims to achieve average GDP growth of between 2.8 percent and 3.6 percent from next year to 2028 and increase GDP per capita from US$39,105 to US$42,787 over the same period.
The National Development Council said the government was confident of achieving the goal.
Taiwan could even catch up with Israel — which ranks 14th globally with a GDP per capita of US$55,535 — after surpassing the GDP per capita of Japan and South Korea, it said.
The most critical factors affecting GDP per capita are, assuming that the population remains unchanged, a country’s currency exchange rate and economic growth rate. The persistent rise in Taiwan’s GDP per capita in recent years reflects steady growth in the country’s economy and the local currency better maintaining its value in US dollar terms when compared with other countries.
For Taiwan to continue its growth and maintain its advantage over other regional economies, the country must maintain strong economic fundamentals and avoid uncertainties that might trigger capital flight and negatively affect exchange rates and economic growth.
The nation must also take advantage of technological innovations to increase productivity in traditional and service industries.
It should also achieve net zero carbon emissions to enhance the nation’s competitiveness.
The country’s economic success is built upon the thriving semiconductor industry, which feeds an insatiable global market for the most advanced chips for cars, 5G telecoms, smart devices and artificial intelligence applications.
Most of Taiwan’s export growth is from the information and communications technology (ICT) sector, with little from textiles, machinery, agriculture or other traditional manufacturing and service sectors.
While workers in the ICT industries have received increasing salaries and big year-end bonuses, their peers in other industries continue to face wage stagnation, which has persisted since 2000.
Those working in non-ICT jobs have little reason to celebrate the news that Taiwan’s GDP per capita might surpass that of Japan and South Korea.
This uneven industrial development has resulted in a few tech firms taking center stage in the economy, while the traditional manufacturing and services sectors (excluding financial firms) face continued income inequality due to limited wage growth.
In addition to raising the minimum wage, the government must assist non-tech manufacturing and service sectors in digital transformation and production upgrades, as combined they account for nearly 87 percent of the nation’s employment.
The growth in the nation’s GDP per capita is not too much of a cause for celebration, given that the fruits of the increase have been so unequally distributed among workers. The major beneficiaries have been shareholders.
According to the latest government statistics, the total labor compensation has consistently grown since 2012, but the ratio of labor compensation to GDP dropped from 45.77 percent in 2012 to 43.07 percent in 2021, a new low, while the ratio of corporate profits to GDP increased from 31.82 percent in 2012 to 36.41 percent in 2021, a new high.
Amid changes in the industrial structure, production model and employment dynamics, shareholders’ share of the benefits of Taiwan’s economic growth has gradually increased over the past 10 years or so, while workers’ share has steadily decreased.
Therefore, the government must look beyond the seemingly satisfying GDP statistics and produce policy incentives which encourage corporations to share more of their profits with workers.
This would help lessen the public’s growing sense of relative deprivation.
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical