When two popular trades, such as buying US big tech stocks and selling the Japanese yen, are unraveling at the same time, investors naturally think they are somehow related.
There is now worry that the unwinding of yen-funded carry trades would wreck investors’ frothy exposures to US technology and artificial intelligence-related companies. After all, the 11 percent surge in the Japanese currency since early last month has been in lockstep with the NASDAQ 100 index’s 13 percent maximum drawdown.
With a carry trade, an investor borrows in the currency of a country with low interest rates, such as Japan and China, and puts their money in one where they can get considerably higher returns. In recent years, the yen has been the most popular funding currency, because of the Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) zero-rate regime.
This strategy turned sour, really quickly, when the BOJ hiked rates last week.
The question now is the size of this carry trade. Some investors might have borrowed in yen, and exchanged the amount into US dollars to purchase popular tech stocks such as Nvidia Corp and Microsoft Corp. This year, the Japanese currency is more correlated with the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index than the country’s own TOPIX.
It is also possible that asset managers had piled into hard-to-sell assets, such as emerging markets bonds, and brokers’ margin calls forced them to offload the most liquid positions in their portfolios. US big tech stocks would be good candidates in this case.
As a result, if this carry trade runs into trillions of dollars, its disorderly unwinding would necessarily magnify the downward move in US stocks. The NASDAQ sell-off might get a reprieve for a day or two, but it would not be entirely over.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to pin down the exact size of this strategy, because unlike stock trades, currency transactions are not tracked centrally on exchanges. The best we have are estimates.
The Wall Street Journal made an insightful observation. One proxy to look at is Japanese banks’ foreign lending. The amount reached US$1 trillion as of March, a 21 percent rise from 2021, Bank of International Settlements data show. The article said that much of the recent growth in cross-border yen lending has been in the so-called interbank market, where banks lend to each other and to other financial firms, such as asset managers. It is an estimate of how much appetite foreign institutional investors have for yen-funded carry trades.
How about Japanese investors? Their net international investment amounted to ￥487 trillion (US$3.3 trillion) as of the first quarter, a 17 percent increase from three years ago. Clearly, much of this comes from foreign reserves. Traditional asset managers’ portfolio carry trades would not be the biggest chunk.
However, in a broader sense, one could argue that the entire Japanese government is engaged in a massive carry trade. It has been funding itself at very low real rates imposed by the BOJ on domestic depositors, while earning higher returns on foreign assets. As such, the US$1.8 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund, which has allocated roughly half of its money to overseas equities and bonds, is essentially the asset manager that runs this money-making machine for the government.
Would the investment fund still be in the US stock market if the BOJ continues to raise rates?
Ultimately, a carry trade is a leveraged play, with people using cheap loans on riskier projects. The BOJ changed its game plan. Now, we are looking at strong repatriation flows back into a currency that is suddenly paying interest to the tune of trillions of dollars. What happens in Tokyo matters greatly to New York.
Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. A former investment banker, she was a markets reporter for Barron’s. She is a CFA charterholder.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS