With the artificial intelligence boom, Taiwan’s demand for electricity is expected to rise in the next few years, which has led to the idea that the decommissioning of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County should be delayed.
The Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) has already been out of service for several years, and with the recent opening of a new dry storage facility, the spent fuel rods stored there can be moved out gradually, enabling the next phase of decommissioning work to begin.
As decommissioning or extending the lifespan of a nuclear power plant requires some time to implement, there is an opportunity to use the decommissioning of the Jinshan plant as an example to evaluate whether the lifespan of the Ma-anshan plant is worth extending.
When decommissioning a nuclear power plant, in addition to moving the nuclear waste to dry storage, the process requires a lot of decontamination and classification work.
After running for about 40 years, a nuclear power plant would have experienced operational problems, which causes nuclear contamination of the plant’s equipment, part of which can only be discovered during its dismantlement.
Therefore, depending on the degree of contamination, some of the waste must be properly processed before capacity reduction, while more seriously contaminated waste that cannot be processed safely must be properly sealed and a safe storage environment sought. This can easily delay decommissioning and result in more funds than was budgeted to be spent.
At present, the Jinshan plant’s turbines and other important facilities have already been dismantled. There has been no international precedent in which a nuclear power plant has been dismantled and then resumed operations again. Theoretically, the possibility of restarting the Jinshan plant is very low.
Nuclear Safety Commission Chairman Chen Tung-yang (陳東陽) has recently said that there is no standard procedure for decommissioning a nuclear power plant. Therefore, there would be a considerable overlap between decommissioning work at the Jinshan plant and any extension evaluation of the Ma-anshan plant.
The public resistance, budget overruns and difficulties in disposing of radioactive waste encountered during the decommissioning of the Jinshan plant could serve as important references to determine whether or not it is cost-effective to delay the decommissioning of the Ma-anshan plant.
If these problems turn out to be more difficult to handle than expected, it would be worth seriously considering whether the government should delay the decommissioning of the Ma-anshan plant.
Given global warming, nuclear power’s low-carbon emissions have once again attracted attention.
However, when decommissioning nuclear power plants, the public must face the difficulties and costs of nuclear waste storage, as well as the plants’ demolition. Under such circumstances, it is worth considering whether nuclear power is the only way to solve the carbon emissions problem.
With geological concerns in Taiwan regarding the construction of nuclear power plants and potential storage sites, the risks of extending the operation of nuclear power plants and the disposal of nuclear waste would be a considerable test for the government.
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS