On July 15, the military honor guards’ “handover ceremony” at the Chiang Kai-shek (CKS) Memorial Hall (中正紀念堂) was performed outdoors for the first time on Democracy Boulevard outside the main hall — rather than in front of former president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) statue inside the main hall.
The 15-minute ceremony is performed once every hour on the hour from 9am to 5pm on the boulevard.
However, the relocation has caused much criticism, with some people saying the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s move is “interfering with the military honor guards.”
Would the military honor guards really die of heat after performing outdoors for 15 minutes under the sun at the CKS Memorial Hall? What about the military honor guards performing outdoors at the mausoleums of Chiang and his son former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) in Taoyuan’s Dasi District (大溪) and at the martyrs’ shrines? Would they not die of heat too? And what about the military troops at training centers? Don’t the military honor guards and troops across Taiwan stay outdoors under the sun for more than 15 minutes? They surely do.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the pan-blue camp say that the DPP government’s withdrawal of the military honor guards’ handover ceremony from the CKS Memorial Hall was done for purely ideological reasons.
However, if this logic is valid, by the same logic the KMT’s practice of treating Chiang Kai-shek, a notorious murderer, as a great leader and sending the military honor guards to salute his stature every day is also ideologically driven.
The pro-unification camp often ridicules new military recruits as being “strawberry soldiers” — soft and easily bruised. Now, the military honor guards at the CKS Memorial Hall merely perform outdoors for 15 minutes, and no longer have to stand on guard inside the hall. So how can they be abused in this way? What about the military honor guards at other sites? Do they not also perform regularly outdoors under the sun?
The military is facing a serious labor force shortage. Why do we not return the elite military honor guards to the troops to train new military recruits? How many resources have already been wasted on the handover ceremony at the CKS Memorial Hall over the past 44 years, and what good do such performances do to Taiwan’s defense and security? The KMT is the master of political ideology, is it not?
The best solution to the problem is to reduce the duties of the military honor guards, who should only be responsible for receiving foreign dignitaries, while other guards across Taiwan should be abolished.
Since this is also the case in Europe, the US, China, Japan and many other countries, why should Taiwan be an exception? Why should the military honor guards also continue to salute Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo at the mausoleums in Dasi?
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Swiftly following the conclusion of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) China trip, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office unveiled 10 new policy measures for Taiwan. The measures, covering youth exchanges, agricultural and fishery imports, resumption of certain flights and cultural and media cooperation, appear to offer “incentives” for cross-strait engagement. However, viewed within the political context, their significance lies not in promoting exchanges but in redefining who is qualified to represent Taiwan in dialogue with China. First, the policy statement proposes a “normalized communication mechanism” between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This would shift cross-strait interaction from
RSS