The Constitutional Court on Wednesday last week held a preparatory hearing for an injunction request to halt the enforcement of controversial new amendments to government oversight laws.
Constitutional Court oral arguments are scheduled for Aug. 6 on the constitutionality of amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code, which were passed on May 28 by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers.
The amendments were signed into law on June 24 and promulgated on June 26.
However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus, the Executive Yuan, President William Lai (賴清德) and the Control Yuan separately filed for a ruling on the constitutionality of the amendments, and also petitioned for an injunction.
Fifteen Constitutional Court justices were present at the hearing, which was broadcast live, and legal representatives of the four petitioners and the Legislative Yuan presented their claims and counterclaims.
Legal representatives of the four petitioners said the amendments have major flaws and are likely to cause irreparable harm to the Constitutional order.
They said the amendments pose dangers to the semi-presidential system, the separation of powers, responsible politics, and the judiciary and Control Yuan’s investigative and adjudicative powers, while the disclosure of confidential government information would cause irreparable harm.
The legislature’s representatives said the amendments aim to strengthen popular sovereignty, responsible politics and improve the quality of the Legislative Yuan’s decisions.
The amendments would not cause any irreparable harm to the constitutional order, they said.
After the three-hour hearing, some KMT lawmakers said they did not have enough time to prepare and the Cabinet should not be allowed to file for a Constitutional interpretation after the legislature rejected its request for reconsideration.
Some KMT lawmakers complained that the legislature’s representatives were asked by a justice whether lawmakers have legal supremacy over the Executive Yuan and the Constitutional Court.
TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) failed to answer a justice’s question on the definition of “counterquestioning” which was mentioned in the amendments.
It is concerning that KMT and TPP lawmakers are already trying to discredit the justices, with Huang beginning his presentation by showing a slide that reads “court justices shouldn’t be the guardian deity of a certain political party,” and telling reporters that the “host, cohost and referees” are on the same side and “everyone who watched the broadcast could see the justices had a stance.”
KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) said it was unfair that the four petitioners had more representatives in total than the legislature, while fellow KMT Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) said it was an unfair trial, which the opposition parties did not have time to prepare for, and they felt “besieged.”
However, ironically, the opposition’s amendments require the president and public officials to immediately answer their questions with no time to prepare.
Despite tens of thousands of protesters’ and hundreds of legal experts’ calls to halt the amendments so that there could be sufficient discussion, the opposition passed them. When asked by a reporter about the definition of “counterquestioning,” Wu said the opposition would “properly explain [the definition] to the people after the bills become laws,” underlining the ambiguity of the amendments.
The opposition lawmakers’ remarks only highlight how they rushed to push through the amendments, disregarding any calls for further deliberation.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou Province, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS