Last week, 3.34 million people watched Annie Johnson and her best friend eat ice cream.
“You gotta give it that old … lick, slurp,” remarked one viewer on TikTok. “What we all wanna know is why aren’t they in the kitchen! Making that delicious ice cream!” exclaimed another. The suggestive online comments continue.
Annie and her friend were not on OnlyFans. They were not in an advertisement for Haagen-Dazs. They were attending the Men’s College World Series finals between the Tennessee Volunteers and Texas A&M.
For nearly 20 seconds, ESPN cameras zoomed in on the two young women enjoying their ice cream treats near the dugout.
The anchors were quick to provide commentary: “You gotta get it before it melts,” one said. The other replied: “On a night like tonight, you’re working fast.”
Sure, it was sweltering in Omaha that evening, but was it necessary to single these women out? No. In doing so, ESPN engaged in a practice that is as old as broadcast: Objectifying women on live TV.
For sports fans, the possibility of seeing yourself on the jumbotron comes with the territory. However, Rosenblatt Stadium, site of the Men’s College World Series, holds 23,000 fans, a far cry from ESPN’s gargantuan audience. Nobody — save the athletes, umpires and coaches — goes to a sporting event thinking they would be broadcast on live television for more than a couple of seconds.
“We woke up getting compared to the Hawk Tuah girl,” Annie said in a TikTok video about her experience. (For those unfamiliar, “Hawk Tuah” is in reference to a woman who recently went viral for using colorful language — “spit on that thang!” — during a man-on-the-street interview by Tim & Dee TV, which is essentially this years version of Girls Gone Wild.)
Yet Annie and her friend were not doing anything sexual: “We just wanted to enjoy a baseball game and it was 100 degrees so god forbid we eat some ice cream. Then people sit back and wonder, hmm, why don’t women feel welcome in these environments? It’s crazy; it’s like we can’t sit and eat our food in peace.”
This is far from the first time the sports network has unnecessarily panned to a woman — hello, Taylor Swift! — during a sporting event. Remember the 2013 BCS National Championship Game between Alabama and Notre Dame? ESPN announcer Brent Musburger took particular interest in AJ McCarron’s girlfriend (now wife) Katherine Webb, who was Miss Alabama the year prior.
“Well, I tell you, you quarterbacks, you get all the good-looking women,” Musburger told his colleagues, cementing his place in history.
The origin of the practice dates back decades. Slate, the online magazine, said that father of Monday Night Football Roone Arledge and longtime ABC director Andy Sidaris brought the “honey shot” to sports television in the early 70s.
In an interview with Los Angeles Magazine at the time, Sidaris (who died in 2007) was described as being “to cheerleaders what Hugh Hefner has been to centerfolds.”
He told the magazine: “Once you’ve seen one huddle you’ve seen them all… So you either look at the popcorn, the guys or the ladies. The choice is clear to me.”
More than 50 years later, the choice ought to be clear to everyone with a camera. Keep your lenses off of the ladies. Yet many men in this world cannot do that. Consider all the horror stories to come out of the iPhone era. The hidden cameras in Airbnbs. The thousands of upskirt photos. The countless bathroom stall creeps. The women who get videotaped on the beach in their sleep.
Last summer, I was heading home on the subway from a Yankees game when a man jumped out of his seat and whispered in my ear: “I was filming you the entire time,” before gesturing at my chest. He then ran off the train, my body stored on his camera.
Imagine how many creeps have saved that video of Annie and her friend eating ice cream. While ESPN probably did not intend for the clip to go viral, it did — unsurprisingly. The network needs to do more to police salacious content, starting by leaving the “honey shot” on the cutting room floor.
Jessica Karl is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and author of the Bloomberg Opinion Today newsletter. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS