It is perhaps counterintuitive that the US would orchestrate a mass naval exercise based in Hawaii, including the participation — this year — of 28 other nations, and say that the intention is to maintain regional peace.
While the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises include activities centered on humanitarian aid and disaster relief, it is hard to escape the fact that the predominant component is military in nature, including testing of weapons and promotion of interoperability of the armed forces of nations that do not usually have such opportunities.
With the arrival of the USS Carl Vinson, a Baden-Wurttemberg-class frigate of the German Navy and the JS Kunisaki, a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Osumi-class tank landing ship, at Pearl Harbor, and plans to sink the USS Tarawa, a decommissioned amphibious assault ship — the largest vessel to be used in the regular sink exercise component of RIMPAC in more than a decade — it is clear that the US means business with this year’s event.
The list of participating units — 40 surface ships, three submarines, 150 fighter jets, 14 land-based armed forces and 25,000 personnel — over the two-month program running from Thursday last week through Aug. 1 speaks to the scale and ambition of the exercises, as does the nature of the nations taking part. RIMPAC this year includes Pacific Rim nations such as Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, South Korea and the US, in addition to Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. This last group represents six of the 10 members of ASEAN.
Other participating states from beyond the Pacific Rim, but with an interest in increasing their presence and the maintenance of peace in the Indo-Pacific region, are Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK.
However, China was not invited this year. It was asked to attend the 2014 and the 2016 exercises, but not to subsequent events due to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) reluctance to adhere to international rules or norms and standards. The US does not mention China by name as the cause for international concern that puts it front and center of the military exercises, but the name hardly needs to be said.
China’s state-backed Global Times noticed the elephant in the room and the meaning behind the planned sinking of the Tarawa, in an editorial on Thursday last week brushing off the US as a “paper tiger” and RIMPAC as a “muscle show,” and insisting that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy would not be impressed or intimidated.
It also accused the US of “poisoning ... the peaceful atmosphere in the Asia-Pacific region” through the exercises.
The accusation that any country other than China was “poisoning the peaceful atmosphere” of the region is pure projection and a repeat of similar attempts by Chinese Minister of National Defense Dong Jun (董軍) at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore from May 31 to June 2. In his comments at the forum, Dong tried to persuade his audience that the US should withdraw from the region and that ASEAN should play a more central role.
What the Global Times’ editorial fails to recognize is that RIMPAC is not so much a show of force by one country, but a show of concern by all participating nations, including the ASEAN members, who would be happy for China to join in, but understand that it is the very country that makes the military nature of the exercises so necessary.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS