The clash between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea is on everybody’s lips in Manila. Prayers broadcast on the radio plead to a higher power for provocateurs to be kept out. Tensions are high, and the Southeast Asian archipelago needs to work with Beijing and Washington to lower the temperature, but not capitulate to Chinese demands.
Doing so would set a precedent for other claimants with stakes in the waterway that would be next to impossible to row back from.
The challenge for Manila now is to balance its economic interests with China without ceding its territorial rights. An incident in the contested waterway on June 17 between Filipino sailors on a resupply mission to the BRP Sierra Madre and the China Coast Guard was among the more aggressive recently.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is not as much that Beijing has won this round — the resupply mission was aborted — but that Manila bungled the fallout with departments at odds about what actually happened.
There appears to be a greater degree of unity now and that is critical as the country attempts to manage the China threat.
The stakes are not just about the Philippines’ sovereignty. They are also about what lies under the waters: huge reserves of oil, gas and fish. Security and trade in the Indo-Pacific region is part of the US’ multi-pronged strategy of engaging with partners and allies, which is why it is pushing for freedom of navigation there.
About 60 percent of maritime trade passes through the Indo-Pacific region. Maintaining an international presence is essential, or else the territory risks being controlled wholly by China.
That was the pitch that US Ambassador to the Philippines MaryKay Carlson made at the East-West Center International Media Conference in Manila last week. She called on China to cease its “bullying behavior” and “harassment of the vessels operating lawfully in the Philippine exclusive economic zone.”
All countries should have sovereign rights to explore, utilize, conserve and manage natural resources in their economic zones, and Beijing should end its interference, Carlson said.
That is obviously not how China sees it — it lays claim to almost all of the South China Sea and earlier this month put in place new regulations that effectively allow it to treat any foreign vessels as trespassers in its waters.
It takes courage to stand up to Beijing: It is now the No. 1 trade and investment partner for many countries in the region, while foreign direct investment flows to the Philippines have fallen in the past few years, according to Arsenio Balisacan, secretary of the Philippine National Economic and Development Authority.
Manila does not want to stop working with China, officials have told me during my visit, and there are already efforts under way to arrange a diplomatic meeting between the two sides.
Any rapprochement would need to be carefully managed so as not to rile up a domestic audience upset by what it views as a very public humiliation of Filipino forces.
Another proposal is for the Philippines to push ahead with a law of its own in the South China Sea that would allow it to affirm its jurisdiction under the auspices of the UN. The process for the bill to become law is quite far advanced by all accounts and just needs to be signed by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
In theory, it would allow the Philippines to closely monitor vessels entering its territorial seas and block those illegally entering, Jonathan Malaya, assistant director-general of the Philippine National Security Council, told me.
This would provide Manila with the legitimacy to defend itself against Beijing’s claims.
Additionally, more frequent joint naval exercises between the US and the Philippines would also help to deter China. There is one expected in the coming weeks, the Washington Post reported.
The US should help Manila by regularly patrolling the waters, and enlisting the support of Japan, South Korea and Australia, which have significant forces in the region and similar strategic aims.
If your neighborhood cop only comes out to police the surroundings every few months, one retired admiral told me, how safe will your home be?
These are all good measures. The key focus now is to ensure that Manila can assert its rights in the contested waterway without being dragged into a dangerous conflict that would almost definitely involve the US and its allies.
This round might have gone to China, but this will be a long and drawn out fight. There is still time to win the next one.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS