The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises.
China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come.
The purpose of excluding China is primarily to maintain regional security and stability. Beijing has disrupted peace, and the international community believes that its participation would not benefit the military exercise. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) flouts international law and is engaged in intimidating neighboring countries. Therefore, excluding China from RIMPAC is aimed at reducing political tensions. This decision provides insight into the perception of the CCP’s behavior among Pacific countries, including Taiwan.
The exclusion from RIMPAC will detract from China’s influence on the international stage. Furthermore, its exclusion suggests that its national defense and military tactics will take a hit from losing the opportunity to engage in military collaboration with other countries. Worse yet, it is highly likely to sour its political relationships with these countries. In the final analysis, China’s political clout will diminish because of this exclusion.
China’s absence from RIMPAC shows that the world has lost faith in the prospect of China’s peaceful rise. Taiwan and its democratic allies across the globe must unite to foil its ulterior motives and to maintain regional security. As one of the world’s democracies, Taiwan undoubtedly has a responsibility to participate in international affairs and assist in constraining China, and help safeguard democratic values and stand up to any threats that might shake the foundations of democracy.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS