While the world just commemorated the 35th anniversary of the June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square Massacre in China, it should also keep an eye out on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) escalating suppression of freedom and democracy.
From the night of June 3, 1989, to dawn of the next day, convoys of Chinese troops and tanks entered central Beijing to clear Tiananmen Square, where hundreds of thousands of students and other people had gathered to demand political reforms and freedoms. While refusing to acknowledge responsibility for the killings, the CCP government has never released an official death toll, but estimates range from several hundred to a few thousand.
To this day, the massacre remains a taboo in China. The Chinese authorities strictly censor all mentions of the incident, and any commemoration could lead to imprisonment. This year, Chinese police completely blocked off Tiananmen Square and online posts on the subject were removed.
The Tiananmen incident has had a massive impact on Chinese, especially the young generation. Taking the “blank paper” protests across China in 2022 as an example, young Chinese have learned to fight for their rights in a way that is more peaceful, but which could spread rapidly, even as Chinese authorities have launched a slew of laws in the name of national security to suppress dissidents.
In Hong Kong, which used to be the only place on Chinese soil that could hold a vigil for the Tiananmen massacre victims, people were inspired by the Tiananmen protesters to launch the “Umbrella movement” in 2014 to demand a democratic direct chief executive election and the “anti-extradition law movement” in 2019 to push for the revocation of an extradition bill violating Hong Kong’s autonomy.
However, since its handover in 1999 to China, Hong Kong has also become an example of how Chinese authoritarian rule erodes democracy and freedoms. Just like how the autonomy of people in Tibet and the Uyghurs in Xinjiang were slashed.
On the eve of the Tiananmen incident’s 35th anniversary, the Hong Kong police arrested at least eight people over social media posts commemorating the tragedy.
Hong Kong courts also found 14 democracy advocates guilty of subversion under the Beijing-imposed National Security Law.
In Taiwan, the spirit of pursuing democracy and freedom demonstrated by Tiananmen protesters also influenced the young people who initiated the Wild Lily movement in 1990, the Wild Strawberry movement in 2008, and the Sunflower movement in 2014 to protest arbitrary legislation to open up trade with China that could sabotage Taiwan’s economy.
This spirit was also seen in the last month’s Bluebird movement that saw 100,000 civilians surround the legislature in Taipei to call for the revocation of unconstitutional amendments that were pushed by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party to expand the powers of the opposition-controlled legislature.
Those controversial bills have simultaneously aroused concerns that China could infiltrate and influence pro-China lawmakers to cripple Taiwan’s governance and democracy.
China’s 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy activists in Tiananmen Square once sparked a profound crisis in Beijing’s relations with Western democracies. On the 35th anniversary of the tragedy, the international community should note China’s brutal violations of civil rights at home, as well as its coercive threats of neighbors that could undermine the international order and global democracy.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS