While the world just commemorated the 35th anniversary of the June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square Massacre in China, it should also keep an eye out on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) escalating suppression of freedom and democracy.
From the night of June 3, 1989, to dawn of the next day, convoys of Chinese troops and tanks entered central Beijing to clear Tiananmen Square, where hundreds of thousands of students and other people had gathered to demand political reforms and freedoms. While refusing to acknowledge responsibility for the killings, the CCP government has never released an official death toll, but estimates range from several hundred to a few thousand.
To this day, the massacre remains a taboo in China. The Chinese authorities strictly censor all mentions of the incident, and any commemoration could lead to imprisonment. This year, Chinese police completely blocked off Tiananmen Square and online posts on the subject were removed.
The Tiananmen incident has had a massive impact on Chinese, especially the young generation. Taking the “blank paper” protests across China in 2022 as an example, young Chinese have learned to fight for their rights in a way that is more peaceful, but which could spread rapidly, even as Chinese authorities have launched a slew of laws in the name of national security to suppress dissidents.
In Hong Kong, which used to be the only place on Chinese soil that could hold a vigil for the Tiananmen massacre victims, people were inspired by the Tiananmen protesters to launch the “Umbrella movement” in 2014 to demand a democratic direct chief executive election and the “anti-extradition law movement” in 2019 to push for the revocation of an extradition bill violating Hong Kong’s autonomy.
However, since its handover in 1999 to China, Hong Kong has also become an example of how Chinese authoritarian rule erodes democracy and freedoms. Just like how the autonomy of people in Tibet and the Uyghurs in Xinjiang were slashed.
On the eve of the Tiananmen incident’s 35th anniversary, the Hong Kong police arrested at least eight people over social media posts commemorating the tragedy.
Hong Kong courts also found 14 democracy advocates guilty of subversion under the Beijing-imposed National Security Law.
In Taiwan, the spirit of pursuing democracy and freedom demonstrated by Tiananmen protesters also influenced the young people who initiated the Wild Lily movement in 1990, the Wild Strawberry movement in 2008, and the Sunflower movement in 2014 to protest arbitrary legislation to open up trade with China that could sabotage Taiwan’s economy.
This spirit was also seen in the last month’s Bluebird movement that saw 100,000 civilians surround the legislature in Taipei to call for the revocation of unconstitutional amendments that were pushed by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party to expand the powers of the opposition-controlled legislature.
Those controversial bills have simultaneously aroused concerns that China could infiltrate and influence pro-China lawmakers to cripple Taiwan’s governance and democracy.
China’s 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy activists in Tiananmen Square once sparked a profound crisis in Beijing’s relations with Western democracies. On the 35th anniversary of the tragedy, the international community should note China’s brutal violations of civil rights at home, as well as its coercive threats of neighbors that could undermine the international order and global democracy.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS