Mike Gallagher, who in April resigned as chair of the US House Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), was known for his strong support for Taiwan and opposition to the CCP.
Nevertheless, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has continued to punish Gallagher even after he left the US House of Representatives for “intervening in China’s internal affairs” as well as violating its interests — including denying him entry to China, freezing any property he owns in the country and banning any Chinese organization or individual from engaging in transactions or cooperation with him.
While Gallagher has long been aware that he would be barred from entering China, and does not hold any Chinese assets, his listing of “civilian status” among the latest Chinese sanctions is yet another political move by Beijing that is more declarative than substantive.
The timing was not coincidental, as the sanction came after Gallagher was employed as a ”senior strategic adviser” by TitletownTech, a venture capital firm based in his Wisconsin hometown that is a partnership between the NFL’s Green Bay Packers and Microsoft.
The Packers, who are four-time Super Bowl champions, are the only community-owned and non-profit professional football team in the US. Growing up in Green Bay, Gallagher and his family are diehard Packers fans, and his wife and two daughters are even shareholders of the team. So working for one of his hometown’s most recognizable employers is in line with his desire to return to his family after he left the House.
With football being the favorite sport of Americans, the chances that the Chinese sanctions would affect the team are slim. The only company likely to be affected is Microsoft.
Gallagher’s employment by TitletownTech is closely related to a massive investment Microsoft made in Wisconsin — US$3.3 billion for an artificial intelligence (AI) data center. US President Joe Biden visited the site to witness a signing ceremony.
The data center is to be the nation’s first manufacturing-focused “AI co-innovation lab” at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in partnership with TitletownTech. One of Gallagher’s new tasks will be to assist the implementation of Microsoft’s investment plan.
China’s hawkish mouthpiece, the Global Times, cited experts who analyzed the sanctions as a disincentive for companies that do business with Gallagher, limiting his room to maneuver in the business world. The English version of the Chinese newspaper directly named TitletownTech, which interestingly did not appear in the Chinese version.
Recently, the CCP ordered government computers to exclude Microsoft’s Windows operating system and switch to Chinese-made software, while Microsoft is preparing to withdraw its China-based AI team.
By punishing Gallagher, Beijing is, as the old Chinese saying goes, “killing the chicken to frighten the monkey.”
Whether his new boss, Microsoft, is the “monkey” in the eyes of Beijing is something to watch.
Chen Yung-chang is a business manager.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS