On April 28, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) ran an opinion piece titled “There’s no problem child in special education classes.” As mentioned, “Many countries have anti-discrimination laws ... our country does not have this kind of law.”
The meaning of this statement is not precise enough, and it needs to be clarified.
While there is no exclusive law against discriminatory language or behavior in Taiwan, there are a number of legal provisions against such language or behavior scattered throughout the nation’s laws.
After a case in 2016 in which a woman surnamed Hung (洪) verbally abused two military veterans, then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) instructed the KMT legislative caucus to propose an “anti-racial discrimination law” to the Legislative Yuan.
At that time, I also published an editorial in the newspaper titled “Do we need an anti-racial discrimination law?” arguing that there was no need to enact separate legislation.
Article 62, Paragraph 1 of the Immigration Act (入出境及移民法) states, “Any person shall not discriminate against people residing in the Taiwan Area on the basis of nationality, race, color, class and place of birth.”
Paragraph 2 states: “Any person whose rights are trespassed due to the discrimination mentioned in the preceding Paragraph can file a complaint to the competent authorities on the basis of the situations of the trespass, unless the matter is regulated by other laws otherwise.”
Article 81 of the act states, “When the competent authority receives a complaint set forth in Article 62 and believes that the matters violate such a provision, it shall notify the person who violates the law to improve within the specified period in the order. If after the lapse of such period, the person still does not improve, he/she shall be fined not less than NT$5,000 and not more than NT$30,000.”
I was once a member of the “complaints review committee against discrimination of people residing in the Taiwan area” under the Ministry of the Interior, responsible for handling public complaints.
Article 5 of the Employment Service Act (就業服務法) also states: “For the purpose of ensuring a national’s equal opportunity in employment, an employer is prohibited from discriminating against any job applicant or employee on the basis of race, class, language, thought, religion, political party, place of origin, place of birth, gender, gender orientation, age, marital status, appearance, facial features, disability, horoscope, blood type, or past membership in any labor union; matters stated clearly in other laws shall be followed in priority.”
Violators are subject to the penalties stipulated in Article 65 of the act.
Article 16 of the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法), as well as several other laws, also mention the prevention of discrimination.
There are some existing anti-discrimination laws in Taiwan, but they are targeted at specific groups and limited to specific areas.
With such fragmentation, Taiwan might consider consolidating the provisions to formulate an exclusive anti-discrimination law for several types of discriminatory words and behaviors, so it can be easily understood and applied by all.
Yu Ying-fu is a lawyer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the
RSS