As their rivalry intensifies, US and Chinese military planners are gearing up for a new kind of warfare in which squadrons of air and sea drones equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) work together like a swarm of bees to overwhelm an enemy.
The planners envision a scenario in which hundreds, even thousands of the machines engage in coordinated battle. A single controller might oversee dozens of drones. Some would scout, others attack. Some would be able to pivot to new objectives in the middle of a mission based on prior programming rather than a direct order.
The world’s only AI superpowers are engaged in an arms race for swarming drones that is reminiscent of the Cold War, except drone technology would be far more difficult to contain than nuclear weapons. Because software drives the drones’ swarming abilities, it could be relatively easy and cheap for rogue nations and militants to acquire their own fleets of killer robots.
Illustration: Tania Chou
The Pentagon is pushing urgent development of inexpensive, expendable drones as a deterrent against China acting against Taiwan. Washington says it has no choice but to keep pace with Beijing. Chinese officials say AI-enabled weapons are inevitable so they, too, must have them.
The unchecked spread of swarm technology “could lead to more instability and conflict around the world,” Georgetown University Center for Security and Emerging Technology analyst Margarita Konaev said.
As the undisputed leaders in the field, Washington and Beijing are best equipped to set an example by putting limits on military uses of drone swarms. However, their intense competition, China’s military aggression in the South China Sea and persistent tensions over Taiwan make the prospect of cooperation look dim.
The idea is not new. The UN has tried for more than a decade to advance drone non-proliferation efforts that could include limits such as forbidding the targeting of civilians or banning the use of swarms for ethnic cleansing.
Drones have been a priority for both powers for years, and each side has kept its advances secret, so it is unclear which country might have an edge.
A Georgetown study of AI-related military spending last year found that more than a third of known contracts issued by both US and Chinese military services over eight months in 2020 were for intelligent uncrewed systems.
The Pentagon sought bids in January for small, unmanned maritime “interceptors.” The specifications reflect the military’s ambition: The drones must be able to transit hundreds of kilometers of “contested waterspace,” work in groups in waters without GPS, carry 1,000-pound (454kg) payloads, attack hostile craft at 40mph and execute “complex autonomous behaviors” to adapt to a target’s evasive tactics.
It is not clear how many drones a single person would control. A spokesperson for the US defense secretary declined to say, but a recently published Pentagon-backed study offers a clue: A single operator supervised a swarm of more than 100 cheap air and land drones in late 2021 in an urban warfare exercise at an Army training site at Fort Campbell, Tennessee.
The chief executive officer of a company developing software to allow multiple drones to collaborate said in an interview that the technology is bounding ahead.
“We’re enabling a single operator to direct right now half a dozen,” said Lorenz Meier of Auterion, which is working on the technology for the US military and its allies. He said that number is expected to increase to dozens and within a year to hundreds.
Not to be outdone, China’s military claimed last year that dozens of aerial drones “self-healed” after jamming cut their communications. An official documentary said they regrouped, switched to self-guidance and completed a search-and-destroy mission unaided, detonating explosive-laden drones on a target.
In justifying the push for drone swarms, China hawks in Washington offer this scenario: Beijing invades Taiwan then stymies US intervention efforts with waves of air and sea drones that deny US and allied planes, ships and troops a foothold.
A year ago, CIA Director William Burns said Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed his military to “be ready by 2027” to invade. However, that does not mean an invasion is likely, or that the US-China arms race over AI would not aggravate global instability.
Just before he died last year, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger urged Beijing and Washington to work together to discourage AI arms proliferation. They have “a narrow window of opportunity,” he said.
“Restraints for AI need to occur before AI is built into the security structure of each society,” Kissinger wrote with Harvard’s Graham Allison.
Xi and US President Joe Biden made a verbal agreement in November last year to set up working groups on AI safety, but that effort has so far taken a back seat to the arms race for autonomous drones.
The competition is not apt to build trust or reduce the risk of conflict, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft senior research fellow William Hartung said.
If the US is “going full speed ahead, it’s most likely China will accelerate whatever it’s doing,” Hartung said.
There is a risk China could offer swarm technology to US foes or repressive countries, analysts say. Or it could be stolen. Other countries developing the tech, such as Russia, Israel, Iran and Turkey, could also spread the know-how.
US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan in January said that US-China talks set to begin sometime this spring would address AI safety. Neither the US defense secretary’s office nor the US National Security Council would comment on whether the military use of drone swarms might be on the agenda.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond to a request for comment.
Military analysts, drone makers and AI researchers do not expect fully capable, combat-ready swarms to be fielded for five years or so, though big breakthroughs could happen sooner.
“The Chinese have an edge in hardware right now. I think we have an edge in software,” said Adam Bry, chief executive officer of US drone maker Skydio, which supplies the US Army, Drug Enforcement Agency and US Department of State, among other agencies.
Chinese military analyst Song Zhongping said the US has “stronger basic scientific and technological capabilities,” but added that the US advantage is not “impossible to surpass.” He said Washington also tends to overestimate the effect of its computer chip export restrictions on China’s drone swarm advances.
Paul Scharre, an AI expert at the Center for a New American Security think tank, believes the rivals are at rough parity.
“The bigger question for each country is about how do you use a drone swarm effectively?” he said.
That is one reason all eyes are on the war in Ukraine, where drones work as eyes in the sky to make undetected front-line maneuvers all but impossible. They also deliver explosives and serve as sea-skimming ship killers.
Drones in Ukraine are often lost to jamming. Electronic interference is just one of many challenges for drone swarm development. Researchers are also focused on the difficulty of marshaling hundreds of air and sea drones in semi-autonomous swarms over vast expanses of the Western Pacific for a potential war over Taiwan.
A secretive, now-inactive US$78 million program announced early last year by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) seemed tailor-made for the Taiwan invasion scenario.
The Autonomous Multi-Domain Adaptive Swarms-of-Swarms is a mouthful to say, but the mission is clear: Develop ways for thousands of autonomous land, sea and air drones to “degrade or defeat” a foe in seizing contested turf.
A separate DARPA program called OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics, had the goal of marshaling more than 250 land-based drones to assist US Army troops in urban warfare.
Project coordinator Julie Adams, an Oregon State robotics professor, said swarm commanders in the exercise managed to choreograph up to 133 ground and air vehicles at a time. The drones were programmed with a set of tactics they could perform semi-autonomously, including indoor reconnaissance and simulated enemy kills.
Under the direction of a swarm commander, the fleet acted something like an infantry squad whose soldiers are permitted some improvisation as long as they stick to orders.
“It’s what I would call supervisory interaction, in that the human could stop the command or stop the tactic,” Adams said.
However, once a course of action — such as an attack — was set in motion, the drone was on its own.
Adams said she was particularly impressed with a swarm commander in a different exercise last year at Fort Moore, Georgia, who single-handedly managed a 45-drone swarm over 2.5 hours with just 20 minutes of training.
“It was a pleasant surprise,” she said.
A reporter had to ask: Was he a video game player? Yes, she said, adding: “And he had a VR headset at home.”
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS