During former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing on Wednesday last week, Xi focused his speech on the theme of peace. He said that people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should “work together to pursue a bright future for peaceful reunification,” adding that “all Chinese on both sides of the Strait are anticipating a peaceful home and harmonious family life. To achieve this, it is imperative to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.”
It was the second meeting between Ma and Xi. In the 2015 exchange in Singapore, Xi took a tough stance, saying that, without the calming effect of the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposition to Taiwanese independence, the ship of peaceful development would run into fierce waves and could even capsize.
Comparing Xi’s previous speech with last week’s, Beijing’s attitude toward Taiwan appears to have gone through a stark turnaround from ferocity to benevolence.
The key factor behind this shift is the changing international situation.
First, US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, known as the “Asia czar” for formulating the Indo-Pacific strategy for the administration of US President Joe Biden, on April 5 said that the AUKUS trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US has a submarine plan that would help deter any potential action by China against Taiwan.
What that suggests is that as soon as China launches any attack or blockade against Taiwan, nuclear submarines operated by Australia under the auspices of AUKUS would take part in counteracting the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Of course the US and UK, as close partners of Australia, would also act accordingly.
Second, on Monday last week, Japanese state broadcaster NHK interviewed US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan. When asked about the possibility of a “Taiwan contingency,” Sullivan said that “the entire thrust of our approach ... is to ensure that such a contingency never comes to pass.”
That interview preceded a summit meeting between Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Washington on Wednesday last week, where the leaders reiterated the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and said that cross-strait issues must be resolved peacefully.
Third, a bilateral summit between the US and Japan was followed on Thursday last week by a trilateral summit between the US, Japan and the Philippines. The countries’ leaders issued a “joint vision statement” in which they affirmed “the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait as an indispensable element of global security and prosperity.”
Within just a few days, the US, the UK, Australia, Japan and the Philippines have all “drawn their swords.” Through AUKUS, the US-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security and the US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty — which together constitute three layers of power in the Indo-Pacific regional security system — these nations have drawn a red line that China must not cross, namely that peace must be maintained in the Taiwan Strait.
Xi’s decision to wave the flag of peace does not necessarily mean that he has really laid down his sword. He might have just found it necessary to act this way under the current conditions. As for Ma’s wish to claim credit for himself, it is not even worth talking about.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises