During former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing on Wednesday last week, Xi focused his speech on the theme of peace. He said that people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should “work together to pursue a bright future for peaceful reunification,” adding that “all Chinese on both sides of the Strait are anticipating a peaceful home and harmonious family life. To achieve this, it is imperative to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.”
It was the second meeting between Ma and Xi. In the 2015 exchange in Singapore, Xi took a tough stance, saying that, without the calming effect of the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposition to Taiwanese independence, the ship of peaceful development would run into fierce waves and could even capsize.
Comparing Xi’s previous speech with last week’s, Beijing’s attitude toward Taiwan appears to have gone through a stark turnaround from ferocity to benevolence.
The key factor behind this shift is the changing international situation.
First, US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, known as the “Asia czar” for formulating the Indo-Pacific strategy for the administration of US President Joe Biden, on April 5 said that the AUKUS trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US has a submarine plan that would help deter any potential action by China against Taiwan.
What that suggests is that as soon as China launches any attack or blockade against Taiwan, nuclear submarines operated by Australia under the auspices of AUKUS would take part in counteracting the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Of course the US and UK, as close partners of Australia, would also act accordingly.
Second, on Monday last week, Japanese state broadcaster NHK interviewed US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan. When asked about the possibility of a “Taiwan contingency,” Sullivan said that “the entire thrust of our approach ... is to ensure that such a contingency never comes to pass.”
That interview preceded a summit meeting between Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Washington on Wednesday last week, where the leaders reiterated the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and said that cross-strait issues must be resolved peacefully.
Third, a bilateral summit between the US and Japan was followed on Thursday last week by a trilateral summit between the US, Japan and the Philippines. The countries’ leaders issued a “joint vision statement” in which they affirmed “the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait as an indispensable element of global security and prosperity.”
Within just a few days, the US, the UK, Australia, Japan and the Philippines have all “drawn their swords.” Through AUKUS, the US-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security and the US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty — which together constitute three layers of power in the Indo-Pacific regional security system — these nations have drawn a red line that China must not cross, namely that peace must be maintained in the Taiwan Strait.
Xi’s decision to wave the flag of peace does not necessarily mean that he has really laid down his sword. He might have just found it necessary to act this way under the current conditions. As for Ma’s wish to claim credit for himself, it is not even worth talking about.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS