Following the intense Hualien earthquake on April 6, the victims who were trapped, injured or lost loved ones might experience a series of complicated emotional responses, such as shock and denial, fear and anxiety, grief and loss, guilt and self-blame, anger and frustration, depression and hopelessness.
While treating past cases of acute post-disaster stress response, I have discovered that many people experience feelings of self-blame and depression.
More specifically, many believe that their actions and decisions caused the disaster or exacerbated its effects. For example, when an earthquake occurred, a father decided to bring his family to a location he deemed safe.
However, members of his family were still injured. The father experienced intense feelings of self-blame: “It’s my fault that my family got hurt.”
Another instance was one survivor of the 2021 Hualien Taroko Express train derailment.
While escaping, the survivor witnessed a victim beside them who had been crushed, crying out: “Save me, save me,” but had no power to help and fled the scene.
Following the incident, the survivor constantly blamed himself for the passenger’s death.
Thoughts of self-blame such as this have a profound and lasting impact, as they not only could worsen emotional burdens, but can also lead to depression, anxiety and thoughts or actions of self-harm.
This could ultimately impede their recovery and make it difficult for them to move forward and rebuild their life.
For this reason, it is critical to help victims become aware of their self-blame, re-observe the cause of disasters from various angles and objectively assess the impact of their actions and decisions.
Victims need help to understand that disasters are often unpredictable and uncontrollable, learn to forgive themselves and place their attention on living in the present and rebuilding their lives, rather than wallowing in self-blame from the past.
Guilt and self-blame are also quite common in children who experience disasters. They might mistakenly believe that their thoughts or behaviors are somehow connected to the disaster.
Children often think: “My thoughts or behaviors can affect the world around me, even causing natural disasters.”
I treated three cases of suspected post-traumatic stress response in elementary-school children following Typhoon Morakot in 2009. All three children exhibited feelings of self-blame and depression.
They believed that their actions — stealing a wallet to go play in an Internet cafe, not listening to their father and opting to kick rocks outside instead of going inside to eat dinner, and getting into an argument with family, respectively — led to God’s punishment, triggering flooding.
Another instance was a child who, on his birthday, wished to have a day off from school.
When a typhoon later struck and caused the school to close, he believed it was his wishes that had caused the typhoon to hit.
In these situations, children mistakenly attribute their behaviors or thoughts as being the cause of disasters, leading to erroneous feelings of guilt and self-blame.
It is incredibly important that parents, caregivers, teachers and psychologists be aware of this and help children understand the real causes of disasters to lessen irrational feelings of self-blame.
Ko Hui-chen is a professor at Asia University’s Department of Psychology and president of the Taichung Clinical Psychologist Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also