Hong Kong’s so-called “patriotic legislature” passed a bill to amend Article 23 of the Basic Law on March 19.
This legislative body had shelved a similarly awful bill to allow extradition to China before half a million Hong Kongers took to the streets in 2021 to protest and pro-democracy parties opposed it.
Now there is nobody in the Legislative Council to oppose such bills, and the bill never underwent a proper, normal legislative process of public review. The second and third readings of the bill were quickly rushed through.
Every member of the “patriotic legislature” showed their subservience to Beijing through their participation in the Article 23 bill. They gleefully expressed the completion of their so-called “constitutional duty” — their “glorious” mission.
They said the legislation would make Hong Kong’s development more stable and robust, and yet they have completely turned a blind eye to the reality of how the territory’s economy, residents’ livelihoods, society and security have all eroded and withered following 2019’s “Revolution of Our Times” movement, reflecting the “fawning with Chinese characteristics” displayed by Hong Kong officials — attitudes which have utterly pervaded the territory.
Hong Kongers’ taxes are being misused to feed a group of voracious officials who have completely walled off Hong Kong from any real progress. The violent suppression of taxpayers by so-called “law enforcement” reflects the importance of a democratic system.
As Hong Kong passed Article 23 of its own accord, Beijing can use this to make a fake declaration to the world that its promises of “one China, two systems and a Hong Kong governed by Hong Kongers” still exists.
Compared with Beijing’s National Security Law, the scope of Article 23 is far broader. Not only does the law add the crimes of “treason,” “stealing state secrets” and “fanning insurrection,” it also includes the related crime of “external interference from outside forces.”
It includes prohibiting Hong Kong groups from establishing exchanges with foreign counterparts. Under such a vague legal framework, foreign institutions and investors in Hong Kong could be designated “foreign government organizations” at will.
Media outlets such as Radio Free Asia and non-governmental organizations like Amnesty International could very well find themselves the first to bear the brunt of this law. This would be tantamount to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) using Hong Kong to carry out China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy. We can only imagine what this would mean for China’s future relations with the free world.
The “crime of concealing traitors” stipulated within Article 23 states that “knowing, but not reporting ... someone who has committed, or is about to commit treason,” is a criminal act in itself. The law encourages people to monitor and report each other.
The intention of the law is clearly to advance the isolation of Hong Kong and sever the relationship between the territory and former residents who have emigrated.
Article 23 targets and indiscriminately arrests people with different ideas than the government in the name of “safeguarding national security.”
As a legal weapon used to exact revenge on the freedom and democracy movement, the “Hong Kong martial law era” has begun, impacting visitors and even those transiting at the airport.
Taipei should raise its travel advisories and warnings for anyone traveling to or through Hong Kong, and recommend that Taiwanese avoid going there.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Tim Smith
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS