Despite all the efforts of prosecutors and police to crack down on scam cases, these crimes continue to proliferate.
However, in the past five years, fewer than 1 percent of those convicted of fraud were sentenced to three years or more in prison, while more than 40 percent were sentenced to less than six months. It gives people an impression that engaging in fraud is low-cost and high-yield, which inevitably tempts some to push their luck. Should the judges be blamed for this?
The offense of fraud regulated in Paragraph 1, Article 339 of the Criminal Code is punishable by up to only five years of imprisonment.
However, with the rampant fraud syndicates in Taiwan, when the Criminal Code was amended in 2014, Paragraph 1 of Article 339-4 was added, increasing the punishment for certain kinds of fraud to imprisonment of one to seven years applicable to cases that have three or more accomplices, use broadcast TV, electronic communication, Internet or other media, and are committed in the name of a government agency or public official without authorization.
Last year, those who used AI-generated images to commit fraud were included in these categories of fraud to catch up with technological advances in criminal practices.
However, the penalty of one to seven years’ imprisonment does leave room for judicial discretion, which basically makes harsher punishment impossible. By the time prosecutors start the investigation, the criminal masterminds behind the fraud might have already fled, or had even long been controlling everything from overseas. As a result, the prosecutors can target only the money mules and dummy accounts, making it difficult to root out the criminal groups.
Money mules, and dummy accounts in particular, are at the bottom of the criminal structure, mostly as accessories to the fraud. So, it is impossible to sentence them to the same punishment as those behind criminal offenses.
These accessories might themselves be victims. For example, someone might become a dummy-account provider due to a job search trap, an investment scam or an urgent need for money, etc. It is doubtful whether people in cases like these can all be charged with indefinite intent to aid a fraud.
This would also lead to the fact that even if a judge finds that there is intent to aid a fraud, it is impossible to impose a harsher sentence of three years or more in prison. Therefore, it is unfair to say that the judge passed a lenient sentence.
If harsher punishment for fraud is desired, it is necessary to provide statutory sentencing provisions with different severity based on the offender’s status in the criminal organization and the amount of benefits gained from fraud, so that the severity of punishment is commensurate with the seriousness of the crime.
However, if you cannot hunt down and prosecute the criminal masterminds, amending the law like this would only serve to comfort yourself. Therefore, to solve such problems, in addition to increasing international cooperation in criminal matters, it is necessary to revive the draft technological investigation act that the Ministry of Justice backed down from a few years ago due to strong backlash.
If this legislative proposal is to be brought up again, a fair balance between crime prevention and human rights protection is needed to avoid the criticism of becoming Big Brother — using mass surveillance and abusing state power — which was why the bill was rejected last time.
Wu Ching-chin is a professor and chair of Aletheia University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,