Buyer beware
Sudan III is an industrial red dye used to add color to plastics, fats and oils, oil-based paints and other goods. It cannot be used as a food ingredient or food item, and is not consumable. It is also carcinogenic and harmful to human health.
There are hundreds of products on the market made from red chili powder, with colors that are robust and whose color saturation is even.
Normal red chili powders (and sauces) present a natural vermilion color. After the product has been opened and used for a while, this color gradually oxidizes and fades. Hot chili sauces are not naturally a robust shade of red.
Red chili pepper powders (or sauces) added to food, such as those used in stirred noodle dishes, can add fragrance and or flavor, but they do not sting one’s nostrils or dye one’s hands. They do not mask the other flavors in foods.
Why do businesses add Sudan III to give their products a bright crimson color? That is because they want to make their products look more appealing and appetizing, or to fake product freshness to entice buyers and boost sales.
For example, if you visit a seafood market, you can see that there is Sudan III painted onto fish gills to trick buyers into thinking that they are purchasing fresh catch.
In chili sauces, ketchup, salted duck eggs, cooked shrimp, kimchi and other foods, Sudan III is added to make it appear as if the food is fresh or that it is spicy and piquant enough. It is easy for buyers to be tricked if they are unaware.
Although there is the 2016 “Five Links of Food Safety” policy in place concerning food safety — sourcing controls, reinforced production management, increased inspections, heavy penalties for businesses that act with malicious intent and public monitoring — if the first four links are broken, consumers would have to rely on themselves to carry out inspections.
Consumers would need to possess adequate common sense about food safety and refuse to purchase such products. Only then would consumers not be cheated.
Chang Keng-wei
Taipei
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS