Buyer beware
Sudan III is an industrial red dye used to add color to plastics, fats and oils, oil-based paints and other goods. It cannot be used as a food ingredient or food item, and is not consumable. It is also carcinogenic and harmful to human health.
There are hundreds of products on the market made from red chili powder, with colors that are robust and whose color saturation is even.
Normal red chili powders (and sauces) present a natural vermilion color. After the product has been opened and used for a while, this color gradually oxidizes and fades. Hot chili sauces are not naturally a robust shade of red.
Red chili pepper powders (or sauces) added to food, such as those used in stirred noodle dishes, can add fragrance and or flavor, but they do not sting one’s nostrils or dye one’s hands. They do not mask the other flavors in foods.
Why do businesses add Sudan III to give their products a bright crimson color? That is because they want to make their products look more appealing and appetizing, or to fake product freshness to entice buyers and boost sales.
For example, if you visit a seafood market, you can see that there is Sudan III painted onto fish gills to trick buyers into thinking that they are purchasing fresh catch.
In chili sauces, ketchup, salted duck eggs, cooked shrimp, kimchi and other foods, Sudan III is added to make it appear as if the food is fresh or that it is spicy and piquant enough. It is easy for buyers to be tricked if they are unaware.
Although there is the 2016 “Five Links of Food Safety” policy in place concerning food safety — sourcing controls, reinforced production management, increased inspections, heavy penalties for businesses that act with malicious intent and public monitoring — if the first four links are broken, consumers would have to rely on themselves to carry out inspections.
Consumers would need to possess adequate common sense about food safety and refuse to purchase such products. Only then would consumers not be cheated.
Chang Keng-wei
Taipei
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS