Ko must address the lies
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) lost to Vice President William Lai (賴清德) by nearly 1.9 million votes in Jan. 13’s presidential election. However, some of Ko’s and TPP’s supporters claimed that voter fraud was to blame for the discrepancy between the party’s polling and the official results. Cognitive warfare waged on TikTok helped to circulate their accusations, but everyone knows that elections in Taiwan are just and transparent, and that voter fraud is extremely unlikely. This is recognized by democratic countries throughout the world. On some video-sharing platforms, Taiwan’s elections have been misrepresented, a distortion harmful to all Taiwanese.
When a mature and sensible politician loses an election, they reflect upon themselves and review their failures. They try to figure out why the majority of voters did not support them. They correct their mistakes and fight again. Ko is not like that.
He knew that no fraud could occur in Taiwan’s elections, but he still attributed his defeat to it. Soon after he realized that the public would not buy his claim, he changed tack, blaming the low voter turnout among younger people for the defeat.
Before the election, most of the polls showed that Ko would finish third. That he could successfully secure 3.69 million votes was already surprising to many. Some people lamented the result, wondering how someone like Ko, a person who is neither thoughtful nor sincere and talks in an incoherent and confusing way, could win the hearts and minds of so many Taiwanese.
A nation’s leader must be mature and stable. They must be a person of integrity. Judging from his political career, Ko lacks the ability and leadership to govern.
When he was Taipei mayor, many people quit their jobs and left the city government because of him. In other words, those who worked under him left him after they had a chance to learn more about him.
During his two terms as mayor, Taipei residents learned that he was not a good mayor, and as a result, they did not vote for Ko in the presidential election.
Ko’s approval rating were the lowest in districts and areas in Taipei, the election results showed. Reports said that the residents of a Hsinchu County village where Ko grew up did not favor him either. These local results say a lot about his character.
Ko’s supporters are mostly young people in their 20s. Once they grow older and accumulate more life experience, their loyalty to Ko would likely decrease. The more mature they are, the less supportive of Ko they would become. Ko knows this, and it is a problem he needs to deal with.
Some of Ko’s followers are students in middle and high schools. They do not have adequate experience to see through Ko, and their source of information is mostly from Chinese video-sharing platforms such as Douyin, the version of TikTok for the Chinese domestic market. As a result, they tell their parents their views and believe that Ko lost the election due to voter fraud. They have fallen victim to China’s cognitive warfare efforts.
While their accusations are absurd and false, Ko should not leave such misinformation as it is. As a politician in Taiwan, he should clarify the issue and take responsibility in protecting Taiwan’s democracy.
Chiu Ping-chin
Taipei
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
RSS