A stabbing incident at a New Taipei City junior-high school is tragic and infuriating. It has suddenly dawned on people that junior-high and elementary school campuses might not be as safe as they believe, leading many to urge the Ministry of Education to ramp up security. Little do people know that school conflicts are nothing new, and in the past few years, incidents have spiked, with serious ones involving students assaulting teachers. It is an issue that desperately requires attention.
Minister of Education Pan Wen-chung (潘文忠) has reminded education personnel to follow the ministry’s guidance and disciplinary rules. If students bring knives or other contraband to school, teachers should immediately report them to school authorities, and the school should report to the ministry.
Pan also asked schools to step up counseling of “red flag” students, as well as offer counseling for students who have been affected by violence. Teachers should also use class time to remind students to take extra caution when playing with toy knives or using sharp stationery utensils.
Pan’s advice rubs salt in the wounds of elementary and junior-high school teachers. Comments from the ministry and its officials were not only boilerplate, but out of touch with individuals’ experiences, and made no attempt to address the root of the problem.
If a student does not wish to follow orders, and even if they assault a classmate or faculty member, teachers are not free to act. When authorities are incapable of doing anything, while parents neglect their responsibility to discipline their children, schools and teachers are left with no other support.
Aside from lambasting the school, the ministry failed to offer assistance.
Teachers are charged with guiding and disciplining students. The problem is that the ministry’s guidance and disciplinary guidelines fail to protect teachers when they impose reasonable discipline on students. They might end up receiving complaints from students or other teachers, or even become targets in campus incidents or controversies.
Facing complaints and grievances, many teachers feel caught in a catch-22.
In an environment where parents are hostile to school faculty, fewer teachers are willing to “meddle in students’ affairs.” It is not because teachers have lost their passion or enthusiasm for education, but that too many disheartening and frustrating controversies concerning student discipline have affected them. Some have been haplessly ensnared in the teacher assessment evaluation system.
Exhausted and backed into a corner, more teachers are steering clear of potential sources of conflict to protect themselves, creating a crisis in Taiwan’s education system.
If students bring contraband to school or commit serious misconduct, teachers dole out punishment, but aside from teachers, should the parents not also share in the responsibility of supervising children?
Teachers should not be blamed for their passiveness, but in an era in which students’ rights are overly protected, even if schools conduct bag searches in accordance with regulations, parents could still file complaints.
When dealing with students who refuse to follow orders, teachers cannot do anything to prevent the teacher-student relationship, classroom management and course schedules from falling into a vicious cycle, aside from giving moral lectures.
In view of the dilemma schools face when it comes to student discipline, as well as the frustration and powerlessness of frontline personnel, these issues cannot be solved with a few words of encouragement or advice from education officials.
The Ministry of Education should tackle the structural problems underlying incidents of campus violence, as well as overhaul regulations and guidelines concerning counseling, while accounting for the frustration of faculty members at schools. It should also increase staffing and resources to help schools deal with campus conflicts.
Regarding recalcitrant students, the government should amend the law and establish penalties for parents who fail to fulfill their duties of disciplining their children.
Unfortunately, while schools are put under the spotlight, few people are actually questioning what has gone wrong with families and parental education. Instead of calling for students to stay late at schools, the presidential candidates should take the lead in reminding the public of the educational purposes of families and to endow parents with more disciplinary responsibility. The decline of parental guidance and lack of support and involvement in children’s education is the underlying cause of campus conflicts.
Lo Te-shui is director of the National Federation of Teachers Unions’ publicity department.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS