At the end of last month, I was invited by the Friends of Lee Teng-hui Association to attend a forum in Japan and give a keynote speech on the Jan. 13 presidential election.
The global community is concerned about Taiwan’s future, yet according to my observation overseas, the people least concerned are Taiwanese.
This does not mean that Taiwanese are indifferent to politics. Compared with Japanese, Taiwanese are political enthusiasts. However, those involved usually do not know what they are doing, and Taiwanese do not know the significance of the ballot in their hands. The election results could change the world.
Taiwan’s public might feel that foreigners have no right and no place to meddle in local politics. After all, people are most concerned about the economy and putting food on the table. What has Taiwan’s future or politics got to do with the Japanese?
However, Taiwanese politics is no longer a domestic affair. It is a global one. In August, the Japanese government sent former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso to Taiwan to inquire about the political vision of Vice President Willam Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential candidate, and the direction Lai has in store for the nation. Before that, Aso also met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘). Aso’s move confirmed that the Japanese government was approaching all potential presidential candidates with the aim of getting first-hand information.
Despite what pro-China politicians and fake news have been saying, Japan has taken serious the stance of “if Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem.” For Japan, it is more than just a political slogan — it is a hard reality. If China makes a move against Taiwan, the question of sending aid to Taiwan goes without saying for Japan, because China would be blocking Japan’s maritime transportation of oil supplies and other strategic goods, and undermining the defense of Japan’s southwestern waters if Tokyo chooses to maintain neutrality. Before a potential invasion, China is likely to first attack joint US military bases in Japan. As a result, Tokyo could be the one facing trouble even before Taipei does.
It is understandable why the global community would be so concerned about Taiwan’s elections. The elections could play a role in determining whether Beijing invades Taiwan. As opposed to the opposition parties’ narrative of “vote for the DPP and young people go to war,” the global community has the impression that a pro-China party would actually bring about a cross-strait war. The reason is fairly simple: Pro-China parties would lower the nation’s guard, thereby making things easy for China.
Aso told reporters that he felt assured after Lai demonstrated his resolve and determination to safeguard Taiwan. This means that Japan feels Taiwan can only keep China at bay with pro-Taiwan parties securing half of the legislative seats and Lai’s administration in office.
Taiwan’s future, of course, eventually rests in the hands of Taiwanese themselves. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) once quoted French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre’s idea that “man is completely free and responsible for himself, but also responsible for all men.”
Taiwan’s public is responsible for casting a ballot that might change the world, and this is the very first step for Taiwanese holding the reins to the nation’s future.
Shogo Lim is a member of the Japan chapter of World United Formosans for Independence and a member of the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Rita Wang
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS