Taipei’s MRT subway signs have recently been internationalized, with Japanese and Korean being added to the existing Chinese and English texts. Meanwhile, signage across China has gradually undergone “de-Anglicization” — the elimination of the English language — turning from bilingual to Chinese only, thus forming a sharp contrast between the two countries. While Taiwan is going international, China appears to be locking itself off from the world.
The decline in Chinese tourists has led the Taiwanese government to promote tourism to other countries. With the increase in foreign tourists, the Taipei MRT has been adding Japanese and Korean to the original Chinese and English signage to make travel more convenient for foreigners. This is a change that Taiwan has made as it tries to move from the Chinese market to the global market, so as not to fall into a tourism crisis due to a lack of Chinese travelers.
Meanwhile, China has changed its highway signs from bilingual to solely Chinese due to its leaders’ preferences. This change has also made its way into schools, where it has started reducing the influence of foreign languages such as English. From banning English as a subject from final exams in elementary schools to limiting elementary-school students’ maximum tutoring hours at English-language institutes, the traces of Beijing’s “de-Anglicization” is visible in almost every aspect of life. This has also led to the closure of online tutoring platforms in China, as they flee to other Chinese-speaking regions to make ends meet.
From these examples, it could be seen that Taiwan is moving toward internationalization and globalization, while broadening its vision to avoid the impact of a single market on its economic development.
The government has also strengthened bilingual education for children to cultivate an international outlook, and an understanding of various foreign cultures through language.
By contrast, China is moving toward “de-Anglicization.” Although the authorities claim that this is to enhance Chinese cities’ image and a sense of national identity among citizens, they are actually giving up the nation’s future competitiveness. In an era of diminishing demographic dividends, would China’s approach result in a more depressed domestic economy and an accelerated outflow of foreign companies from China? The impacts from this could be seen in China’s surging youth unemployment rate and the massive withdrawal of foreign firms. If Beijing persists with its “de-Anglicization” campaign, its economy might go from bad to worse.
Taiwan’s and China’s traffic signs also demonstrate the completely different policy thinking of the two countries. China has used official propaganda to cover up the crisis brought about by its “de-Anglicization” and exaggerated its people’s self-confidence. In doing so, its next generation might eventually lose its international competitiveness.
As for Taiwan, through bilingual education and bilingualization or multilingualization of signage, its next generation would be more accustomed to the use of foreign languages, and would be able to boost its national competitiveness. As a result, Taiwan and China would be on two very different paths, and the former is expected to achieve greater success.
Yang Feng-jung is an interior designer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS