Government pledges for climate adaptation at the COP28 summit have fallen far short of the target, with officials warning that resources to build resilience to wilder weather and rising seas could be diverted into a new “loss and damage” fund instead.
At a meeting at the Dubai talks late on Monday, rich countries offered only US$160 million in contributions to the Adaptation Fund — barely half of its US$300 million goal this year for projects such as flood defences and early-warning systems.
In contrast, the loss and damage fund approved at the start of COP28 aims to help vulnerable countries or communities recover from climate impacts that cannot be avoided, such as repairing devastated property after a storm or relocating people threatened by rising seas and protecting cultural heritage.
Several governments have mentioned the approval of that new fund among their reasons for offering less money for adaptation, Adaptation Fund head Mikko Ollikainen said.
“The new loss and damage fund, there is so much political momentum around it ... that countries have really dug deep to find resources for that,” said the UN climate conference in Dubai, calling that “very positive.”
However, he warned that without sufficient adaptation funding, the costs of damage from climate impacts will grow.
Developing nations are pushing for new adaptation finance targets to be included in how countries respond to the Global Stocktake — a UN assessment showing climate action is lagging far behind what is needed — but their efforts have been met with pushback by rich nations.
At the COP26 talks in Glasgow two years ago, the Adaptation Fund — established in 2001 and a leading global fund for such projects — raised a record US$356 million in new pledges, more than double the amount raised so far at COP28.
At COP26, wealthy governments also committed to double adaptation finance to at least US$40 billion a year by 2025, but have made little progress since.
This year is set to be the warmest since records began in 1940, due to climate change as well as an El Nino weather pattern, the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service said.
As a result, climate impacts including floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves have been felt across the world — and especially severely by developing nations, which have the least ability to withstand them.
Despite this, experts say funding for adaptation measures is far short of global needs and has been plateauing as many rich nations have failed to give more amid multiple political and economic crises including the Ukraine war and inflation.
A recent report by the UN Environment Programme said projected annual adaptation costs and needs were 10 to 18 times more than the actual finance available in 2021, and funding fell by US$4 billion between 2020 and 2021.
“We are in danger of allowing the narrative on loss and damage to crowd out the importance that is absolutely still necessary for adaptation,” Barbadian Prime Minister Mia Mottley told a press conference this week.
“What we want is to avert damage and avert loss before the event, which is why adaptation finance is critical,” she said.
In the first week of COP28, governments have pledged more than US$50 million to the loss and damage fund, led by the summit’s host, the United Arab Emirates, and Germany, which pledged US$100 million each.
But a major concern raised by officials and experts is whether the money promised is new cash and, if not, what other projects may lose their share of aid budgets — such as adaptation.
“We are all concerned,” UN Development Programme (UNDP) Administrator Achim Steiner said.
The UNDP helps countries implement projects backed by the Adaptation Fund.
“I think it is now up to those who are pledging their contributions to the loss and damage fund to demonstrate that this is not ... deducting funds from either mitigation or adaptation,” he said, adding that the UNDP is watching the situation carefully.
Governments must also pay more attention to the nature of these adaptation funds — such as whether they are loans or grants, said Ebony Holland, nature and climate policy lead at the International Institute for Environment and Development, a policy research body.
Countries most vulnerable to climate impacts want donors to provide more grants than cheap credit, and ensure the money is informed by the priorities of local communities instead of “funders and governments in distant countries,” she said.
“An overemphasis on the volume of funding shadows the critical need to ensure the quality of this finance,” Holland said.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS