Government pledges for climate adaptation at the COP28 summit have fallen far short of the target, with officials warning that resources to build resilience to wilder weather and rising seas could be diverted into a new “loss and damage” fund instead.
At a meeting at the Dubai talks late on Monday, rich countries offered only US$160 million in contributions to the Adaptation Fund — barely half of its US$300 million goal this year for projects such as flood defences and early-warning systems.
In contrast, the loss and damage fund approved at the start of COP28 aims to help vulnerable countries or communities recover from climate impacts that cannot be avoided, such as repairing devastated property after a storm or relocating people threatened by rising seas and protecting cultural heritage.
Several governments have mentioned the approval of that new fund among their reasons for offering less money for adaptation, Adaptation Fund head Mikko Ollikainen said.
“The new loss and damage fund, there is so much political momentum around it ... that countries have really dug deep to find resources for that,” said the UN climate conference in Dubai, calling that “very positive.”
However, he warned that without sufficient adaptation funding, the costs of damage from climate impacts will grow.
Developing nations are pushing for new adaptation finance targets to be included in how countries respond to the Global Stocktake — a UN assessment showing climate action is lagging far behind what is needed — but their efforts have been met with pushback by rich nations.
At the COP26 talks in Glasgow two years ago, the Adaptation Fund — established in 2001 and a leading global fund for such projects — raised a record US$356 million in new pledges, more than double the amount raised so far at COP28.
At COP26, wealthy governments also committed to double adaptation finance to at least US$40 billion a year by 2025, but have made little progress since.
This year is set to be the warmest since records began in 1940, due to climate change as well as an El Nino weather pattern, the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service said.
As a result, climate impacts including floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves have been felt across the world — and especially severely by developing nations, which have the least ability to withstand them.
Despite this, experts say funding for adaptation measures is far short of global needs and has been plateauing as many rich nations have failed to give more amid multiple political and economic crises including the Ukraine war and inflation.
A recent report by the UN Environment Programme said projected annual adaptation costs and needs were 10 to 18 times more than the actual finance available in 2021, and funding fell by US$4 billion between 2020 and 2021.
“We are in danger of allowing the narrative on loss and damage to crowd out the importance that is absolutely still necessary for adaptation,” Barbadian Prime Minister Mia Mottley told a press conference this week.
“What we want is to avert damage and avert loss before the event, which is why adaptation finance is critical,” she said.
In the first week of COP28, governments have pledged more than US$50 million to the loss and damage fund, led by the summit’s host, the United Arab Emirates, and Germany, which pledged US$100 million each.
But a major concern raised by officials and experts is whether the money promised is new cash and, if not, what other projects may lose their share of aid budgets — such as adaptation.
“We are all concerned,” UN Development Programme (UNDP) Administrator Achim Steiner said.
The UNDP helps countries implement projects backed by the Adaptation Fund.
“I think it is now up to those who are pledging their contributions to the loss and damage fund to demonstrate that this is not ... deducting funds from either mitigation or adaptation,” he said, adding that the UNDP is watching the situation carefully.
Governments must also pay more attention to the nature of these adaptation funds — such as whether they are loans or grants, said Ebony Holland, nature and climate policy lead at the International Institute for Environment and Development, a policy research body.
Countries most vulnerable to climate impacts want donors to provide more grants than cheap credit, and ensure the money is informed by the priorities of local communities instead of “funders and governments in distant countries,” she said.
“An overemphasis on the volume of funding shadows the critical need to ensure the quality of this finance,” Holland said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS