What does humanitarian law say about hospitals?
The Geneva Conventions, adopted in the aftermath of World War II, form the core of international humanitarian law and “are particularly protective of civilian hospitals,” said Mathilde Philip-Gay, an expert in international humanitarian law at Lyon 3 University in southeast France.
“It is forbidden to turn recognized civilian hospitals into a conflict zone. It is also forbidden to use civilian populations, the sick or the injured as human shields. It is a war crime, as is fighting from inside a hospital,” she said.
Article 8 of the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, defines a long list of war crimes, including “intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected.”
However, it makes an exception if the targets are “military objectives.”
Philip-Gay said that “if a civilian hospital is used for acts harmful to the enemy, that is the legal term used,” the hospital can lose its protected status under international law and be considered a legitimate target.
Nevertheless, if there is doubt as to whether a hospital is a military objective or being used for acts harmful to the enemy, the presumption, under international humanitarian law, is that it is not, she said.
It is widely accepted that Hamas has an extensive tunnel network across Gaza.
Israel is not a member of the ICC, but the ICC says it has jurisdiction in Gaza and the West Bank, because Palestine is a state party to the court, a claim Israel disputes.
“For those responsible for targeting and firing missiles, I wish to be clear on three points in particular. One: in relation to every dwelling house, in relation to any school, any hospital, any church, any mosque — those places are protected, unless the protective status has been lost because they are being used for military purposes. Two: if there is a doubt that a civilian object has lost its protective status, the attacker must assume that it is protected. Three: the burden of demonstrating that this protective status is lost rests with those who fire the gun, the missile, or the rocket in question,” ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan wrote in the Guardian.
“In this context, I would also underline that the indiscriminate firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel may represent breaches of international humanitarian law subject to the jurisdiction of the ICC,” Khan said.
Yet, what happens if a hospital loses its protected status?
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs says that “any military operation around or within hospitals must take steps to spare and protect the patients, medical staff, and other civilians. All feasible precautions must be taken, including effective warnings, which consider the ability of patients, medical staff, and other civilians to evacuate safely.”
“The other party must take all precautions to avoid intentionally targeting civilians,” Philip-Gay said.
Even if the hospital was used for “acts harmful to the enemy,” the other party “does not have the right to bombard it for two days and completely destroy it,” she said, citing the need under international law for the response to be “proportionate.”
She added that the other party must give advance warning of its response, and that evacuation procedures must be put in place for patients and health workers.
Alternatively, they could be asked “to isolate themselves in a part of the hospital,” she said.
However, during any military operation against the site, “there have to be doctors to take care of the patients,” she added.
With Agence France-Presse
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS