In the current digitalized world, it is increasingly difficult to distinguish between genuine concerns raised democratically by citizens and politically motivated talking points pushed forth by those with ulterior motives.
There was a time when online users could calmly articulate a political position and others would likewise respond in a thoughtful manner. These days, respectful disagreements and civil online debates are rare. The descent toward a populist online culture is no particular group’s fault. Social media platforms constantly flood their users with information far beyond the limits of a sane person’s attention span. In this ecosystem, sensationalist positions are naturally the ones that get the most spotlight.
Nonetheless, there are often concentrated efforts by presumptuous individuals like former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) employee Hsu Che-pin (許哲賓) — who was involved in faking death threats along with online personality Lin Yu-hong (林裕紘) to garner public support during the egg scandal — to manufacture crisis and sow distrust. Even though they lacked any convincing evidence, KMT legislators previously held a news conference accusing the DPP of involvement in sending the threats.
A recent legal investigation revealed that Hsu possessed more than 1,000 Facebook accounts. There is no reasonable explanation why a normal citizen needs to possess so many accounts. Hsu’s ties to the KMT and other pan-blue factions must be taken seriously under the ongoing investigation. This is likely the tip of the iceberg.
What other disinformation has Hsu spread online? Were his numerous accounts used to promote any particular political campaigns or to attack opponents? Has any group or foreign entity paid Hsu for his services?
The KMT’s response to the scandal has been disappointing. It seems to be distancing itself from Hsu and hoping that the situation would eventually resolve itself. Any transparent investigation into Hsu during his employment as a KMT staffer has been utterly lacking. Are Taiwanese supposed to believe that Hsu’s fake death threats were an isolated incident and that he had never used his numerous fake accounts before the incident?
Any political party that directly or indirectly manipulates voters online through fake accounts should be condemned. These manipulations are not only detrimental to a healthy functioning society, but also toxic to an individual’s mind.
US novelist John Steinbeck once wrote: “The free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”
If Taiwan truly wishes to accommodate free and exploring minds, political parties must lead by example and refrain from using underhanded political tactics. The Internet as frontier for the free exchange of ideas is something truly worth protecting. Furthermore, Taiwanese must make all parties realize the grave political costs of orchestrating online misinformation campaigns.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS