In the current digitalized world, it is increasingly difficult to distinguish between genuine concerns raised democratically by citizens and politically motivated talking points pushed forth by those with ulterior motives.
There was a time when online users could calmly articulate a political position and others would likewise respond in a thoughtful manner. These days, respectful disagreements and civil online debates are rare. The descent toward a populist online culture is no particular group’s fault. Social media platforms constantly flood their users with information far beyond the limits of a sane person’s attention span. In this ecosystem, sensationalist positions are naturally the ones that get the most spotlight.
Nonetheless, there are often concentrated efforts by presumptuous individuals like former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) employee Hsu Che-pin (許哲賓) — who was involved in faking death threats along with online personality Lin Yu-hong (林裕紘) to garner public support during the egg scandal — to manufacture crisis and sow distrust. Even though they lacked any convincing evidence, KMT legislators previously held a news conference accusing the DPP of involvement in sending the threats.
A recent legal investigation revealed that Hsu possessed more than 1,000 Facebook accounts. There is no reasonable explanation why a normal citizen needs to possess so many accounts. Hsu’s ties to the KMT and other pan-blue factions must be taken seriously under the ongoing investigation. This is likely the tip of the iceberg.
What other disinformation has Hsu spread online? Were his numerous accounts used to promote any particular political campaigns or to attack opponents? Has any group or foreign entity paid Hsu for his services?
The KMT’s response to the scandal has been disappointing. It seems to be distancing itself from Hsu and hoping that the situation would eventually resolve itself. Any transparent investigation into Hsu during his employment as a KMT staffer has been utterly lacking. Are Taiwanese supposed to believe that Hsu’s fake death threats were an isolated incident and that he had never used his numerous fake accounts before the incident?
Any political party that directly or indirectly manipulates voters online through fake accounts should be condemned. These manipulations are not only detrimental to a healthy functioning society, but also toxic to an individual’s mind.
US novelist John Steinbeck once wrote: “The free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”
If Taiwan truly wishes to accommodate free and exploring minds, political parties must lead by example and refrain from using underhanded political tactics. The Internet as frontier for the free exchange of ideas is something truly worth protecting. Furthermore, Taiwanese must make all parties realize the grave political costs of orchestrating online misinformation campaigns.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
RSS