Taiwan’s major political parties are engaged in intense campaigning for next year’s presidential and legislative elections. From the perspective of Taiwanese ethnic groups, every time there is an election, indigenous people can do little but watch from the sidelines.
After elections, the inaugurations of new presidents, legislators and ministers seem to have nothing to do with them, with the exception of whoever wins the six indigenous legislative seats and whoever becomes minister of the Council of Indigenous Peoples, which are normally allocated to indigenous people.
Other important ministers and legislators are almost always exclusively Han elites.
No matter which party is in power, the disadvantages indigenous people face in political participation does not improve. In the 2020 legislative elections, four parties crossed the threshold of 5 percent of the vote to nominate legislators-at-large, but they either did not recommend indigenous lawmakers or had put them low in their rankings of lawmakers, giving them little chance of winning a seat.
There is not a single indigenous representative among the 34 legislators-at-large.
The idea of legislators-at-large is to allow parties to recommend experts or representatives of underrepresented groups to uphold the ideal of taking care of disadvantaged people and ethnic minorities.
Hopefully, the main political parties in the January elections would recommend representatives of ethnic minorities and disadvantaged groups for legislator-at-large seats to give them a voice in the legislature and realize transitional justice.
It would create a positive image for the parties and win the support of voters.
Kuo Chun-yen is a professor of Providence University’s Department of Social Work and Child Welfare.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS