Taiwan’s major political parties are engaged in intense campaigning for next year’s presidential and legislative elections. From the perspective of Taiwanese ethnic groups, every time there is an election, indigenous people can do little but watch from the sidelines.
After elections, the inaugurations of new presidents, legislators and ministers seem to have nothing to do with them, with the exception of whoever wins the six indigenous legislative seats and whoever becomes minister of the Council of Indigenous Peoples, which are normally allocated to indigenous people.
Other important ministers and legislators are almost always exclusively Han elites.
No matter which party is in power, the disadvantages indigenous people face in political participation does not improve. In the 2020 legislative elections, four parties crossed the threshold of 5 percent of the vote to nominate legislators-at-large, but they either did not recommend indigenous lawmakers or had put them low in their rankings of lawmakers, giving them little chance of winning a seat.
There is not a single indigenous representative among the 34 legislators-at-large.
The idea of legislators-at-large is to allow parties to recommend experts or representatives of underrepresented groups to uphold the ideal of taking care of disadvantaged people and ethnic minorities.
Hopefully, the main political parties in the January elections would recommend representatives of ethnic minorities and disadvantaged groups for legislator-at-large seats to give them a voice in the legislature and realize transitional justice.
It would create a positive image for the parties and win the support of voters.
Kuo Chun-yen is a professor of Providence University’s Department of Social Work and Child Welfare.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS