With the ongoing Ukraine war, it is hard to see past the shock of another major conflict breaking out in the world. Hamas, the Palestinian Muslim organization that runs Gaza City, has orchestrated an unprecedented assault on Israel with thousands of rockets and fighters by land, sea and air over the weekend.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that the conflict demonstrated the “horrors of war” and reiterated the importance of cross-strait peace.
While the Ukraine war taught Taiwan that conflict is not a thing of the past, the situation in Israel could teach it a thing or two about the dangers of complacency, disunity and the potential for strife.
Ever since its founding, Israel has been engaged in wars with neighboring Arab and Muslim nations, as it strives for normalization, while hoping that one day its adversaries would lay down their weapons and acknowledge its statehood. Diplomatically, the signing of the Abraham Accords by the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain in 2020 to recognize Israel’s sovereignty has set examples for other neighboring countries to follow. The US’ recent push for a grand bargain to normalize relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel is the final piece in the puzzle for Israel’s complete normalization.
In terms of military power, Israel seems to have cracked the Hamas problem with technology, with the introduction of the Iron Beam laser system and the Iron Dome missile system. Along with its “iron wall,” Israel likely considered its war against Hamas over in terms of strategy, military prowess and diplomacy.
Perhaps it is this complacency and overconfidence in its missile intercept system that had Israel hosting the Tribe of Nova music festival less than 5km from Gaza City. Years of false alarms and overwhelming dominance over the enemy had tripped Israelis up, and its citizens and military personnel were not able to react quickly when Hamas breached the border.
Similarly, this kind of complacency could easily take root in the minds of Taiwanese. With the launch of its first domestically built submarine, Taiwan could easily think it could rest on its laurels for reaching a new high in its defense capabilities. With China’s economy in tatters, Taiwan forming closer ties with democratic allies, and years of peace, the Taiwanese public could become lax.
As the conflict in Israel has shown, vigilance should never be lost, not a second or minute. The old Chinese saying could not have put it better: “Thrive in calamity and perish in soft living.”
Taiwan should continue ratcheting up its efforts to improve the military conscription program and develop domestic weapons.
Taiwan should think about the possibility of a proxy war, just as it was Hamas, not the Palestinian government, that attacked Israel. Tunghai University political science professor Shen Yu-chung (沈有忠) said that China could plan terrorist attacks, hire mercenaries or incite a pro-China third party to launch attacks against Taiwan, such as creating chaos at elections or targeting infrastructure.
Aside from staying vigilant and preparing for different possibilities, the Taiwanese public should work on bolstering solidarity and consensus to counter China.
As the US, Taiwan’s biggest ally, is now involved in the Ukraine quagmire and could be dragged into yet another conflict in the Middle East, China could be led to misjudge the situation. To prevent that, Taiwan would have to boost its own defenses if it seeks to keep China at bay.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS