On Sept. 22, the UN General Assembly wound up its 78th annual General Debate in New York City, again excluding Taiwan.
However, most of the nation’s diplomatic allies voiced their support for allowing Taiwan to participate in the UN system.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves and Saint Kitts and Nevis Prime Minister Terrance Drew, as well as Belizean Minister of Foreign Affairs Eamon Courtenay, made similar appeals in their respective addresses. Paraguayan President Santiago Pena, who visited Taiwan in July as president-elect, said that the world body should reflect on “participatory, democratic and equitable practices” in line with the UN Charter.
UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed added her voice to the appeals, saying that the exclusion of anyone harms efforts to achieve global development goals.
“Every person matters, whether it’s Taiwan or otherwise. And I think it’s really important for member states to find a solution,” she said.
It has always been Taiwan’s national goal to participate in the UN. In an interview with Foreign Policy, Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said that it would be “very hard” for Taiwan to achieve membership, but that there was still hope.”
“I think there is growing attention from the international community that there has to be peace between Taiwan and China and the best forum to discuss this issue will be the UN,” Wu said. “So, keeping Taiwan out of the UN is immoral, is unjust and is something that we have to make change to.”
As China continues its saber-rattling, Wu’s remarks ring true.
Taiwan is excluded under UN Resolution 2758 of 1971, which recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the legitimate representative of China to the UN.
However, even before that happened, supporters of Taiwan had said that it should focus on political reform to establish a new free and democratic nation, and “rejoin” the UN.
On Sept. 24, the National Taiwan University Student Association hosted a forum to commemorate the passing of Taiwanese democracy pioneer Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) and his 1964 manifesto A Declaration of Formosan Self-Salvation, in which he proposed the concept of Taiwanese nationhood.
The declaration stipulates that one of the goals is to rejoin the UN as a member of the free world, and establish diplomatic relations with other peace-loving countries and work for world peace together.
As he had been an adviser to Taiwan’s delegation to the UN, Peng firmly believed that the most pressing task for Taiwan was to cast aside distinctions between ethnic Taiwanese and mainlanders, unite as one people to found a new nation with a new constitution, and rejoin the UN as an independent country.
Unfortunately, Peng was unable to witness Taiwan’s normalization as a bona fide nation state and 60 years later, it is still striving to realize his unfinished dream.
Even though the road to joining the UN is paved with obstacles and difficulties, Taiwan should not give up, but appeal to the global community incessantly. The exclusion of a highly developed society with a population of 23 million from the UN is unjust, unfair and violates the universal values of the UN Charter.
For this, the US House of Representatives in July passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which states that Resolution 2758 does not apply to Taiwan.
When the UN passed the resolution, it did not exclude Taiwan from participating and did not address the issue of representation of Taiwan and its people in the UN or any related organizations, nor did it take a position on the relationship between China and Taiwan or include any statement pertaining to Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Excluding Taiwan undermines world peace. Taiwan’s participation has never been more crucial, especially in regard to geopolitical trends in the global community. Before the General Assembly this year, the cochairs of the US Congressional Taiwan Caucus issued a joint statement reiterating its “steadfast support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations” and rejected prior actions by the UN to bar Taiwan from meaningful participation, especially the adoption of Resolution 2758.
On behalf of the G7 foreign ministers, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Yoko Kamikawa underscored their collective support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations.
In an opinion piece published by USA Today on Sept. 20, Representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) urged the global community to “stop following China,” as the UN is “ruled by the peoples, not authoritarian regimes.”
She also expressed the hope that the UN and other international organizations “will soon correct their Taiwan policy and provide equal opportunity for participation to the people of Taiwan.”
At the General Assembly on Sept. 19, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy repeated Kyiv’s stance that Moscow’s veto power belonged to the former Soviet Union — one of the victors of World War II after which the UN was created — and not to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Russia.
“Veto power in the hands of the aggressor is what has pushed the UN into deadlock,” Zelenskiy said, adding that it is impossible for the global body to stop Russia’s invasion of Ukraine because of Moscow’s ability to veto any effort or initiative at the Security Council.
As permanent members of the Security Council, China, France, Russia, the UK and the US wield veto power. The rule has been criticized for its undemocratic nature, as a single country can prevent the council from taking action. This structural flaw is the reason behind the UN’s inability to tackle many problems and why it is long overdue for reform.
That Russia and the People’s Republic of China, which was founded after World War II, possess veto power underlines how the 193-member international organization has not shaken off the yoke of authoritative regimes.
To make matters worse, only US President Joe Biden addressed the UN gathering, as the other four founding, permanent council members were conspicuously absent, leading to questions about how much the UN can hope to achieve.
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi’s (王毅) absence caused murmurs, with speculation that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs is still in disarray after former minister Qin Gang’s (秦剛) sudden departure.
Former New York mayor Edward Koch once called the UN a “cesspool,” while former US senator Jesse Helms once described UN contributions as “pouring money down foreign rat holes.”
This shows that a complete overhaul of the almost 80-year-old organization is long overdue.
Translated by Rita Wang
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS