Some amount of hyperbole is to be expected in national conversations, especially as an election draws near. As the most important poll in eight years starts to crest over the horizon, aggrievement and aggrandizement seem to have gone into overdrive — and about eggs, no less.
The issue began earlier this year, when an egg shortage sweeping the rest of the world caught up with Taiwan. The causes were manifold, as they often are, led by a global bird flu pandemic that devastated populations of egg-laying hens, cold weather affecting production, and material prices raising feed and energy costs for farmers. These factors pushed egg prices up from NT$23.5 (US$0.73) per 600g in 2021 to NT$45.5 in March, triggering scarcity fears that inevitably led to hoarding.
The government responded with a special import program, ultimately shipping 145 million eggs from Brazil and six other nations between March and July, and fixing prices slightly higher to stop them from inflating even further. It also earmarked NT$3.3 billion over three years to modernize the domestic egg industry and boost local production, with an eye on ensuring that the nation is never again affected by the vicissitudes of global production. Earlier this month, the Ministry of Agriculture said that Taiwan should be egg self-sufficient by November. Yet most people have not heard all this good news, as it has been buried by an avalanche of controversy.
Opposition politicians have called countless news conferences to lambast the government for a number of issues, including the destruction of 37 percent of the imports after they expired, improper labeling and the discovery of banned substance residues in eggs from Brazil. The criticisms included unsubstantiated accusations that expired eggs had been sold in supermarkets and that import contracts had been granted as political favors.
In response, the Food and Drug Administration and local governments have expanded inspections of egg processing factories, finding a few infractions, but nothing of substantive concern (despite what some politicians might say). Even the unfortunate destruction of expired imports is not unusual, as 37 percent is on par with the US Department of Agriculture’s estimated food waste of 30 to 40 percent.
Weeks of political furor culminated last week in the resignation of former minister of agriculture Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲), pushing out an official who has served as either deputy head or head of agriculture in Taiwan since 2016.
Still, politicians remain reticent to drop the issue, seeing how politically useful it has been. Now that the public has been steeped in fears of food safety, demand for domestically produced eggs has skyrocketed amid distrust of imports. Due to this, egg prices are to rise again this week to NT$55 per 600g from NT$53 for retail consumers and to NT$45.5 from NT$43.5 at last production sites, according to the Taipei Egg Retailers’ Association, which also expects the egg shortage and price hikes to worsen throughout the rest of the year due in part to decreased consumption of imports.
Thanks to the circus manufactured by political opportunists, the egg woes of months past are making a comeback.
This is not to say that issues raised by politicians are invalid. Heavier scrutiny in the name of food safety and holding elected officials accountable is always welcome. Yet when controversy eclipses real issues, it distorts the truth even further, creating the kind of reactionary backsliding that leaves everyone worse off.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS