Internet connectivity is a lifeline — albeit a fragile one — for Taiwan. A recent war game staged in Taipei with experts from the military, tech industries, academia and government suggested that, in the event of a Chinese blockade, the island would be particularly vulnerable to a communications cutoff.
The threat to Taiwan’s digital infrastructure was made plain in February, when Chinese maritime vessels severed two submarine cables connecting the Taiwan to Matsu, a tiny archipelago that belongs to Taiwan but is located just off China’s coast. The months-long outage deprived residents of Internet access and left Matsu, which houses a strategic military base, open to attacks. The damaged cables also exposed the vulnerability of the US tech giant Google, which has a data center on Taiwan’s western coast.
Currently, 15 submarine cables connect Taiwan to global telecommunications. A Chinese invasion or prolonged blockade could thus cut off the island from the world, with consequences for the global economy and financial markets. Such an outcome could also threaten the security of the US and its regional allies, including Japan. As a result, the Taiwanese government must focus on strengthening communication capabilities and ensuring robust and reliable Internet connectivity.
One potential solution is to engage the services of Starlink, the mobile satellite Internet system operated by Elon Musk’s rocket company, SpaceX. Some would argue that Musk, who also owns X (formerly Twitter), is the Internet’s most powerful man; others would describe him as the most erratic. Starlink, a key part of Musk’s business empire, provides Internet connectivity globally through its more than 4,500 low Earth orbit satellites.
Soon after Russia invaded Ukraine, Musk allowed his satellites to broadcast in Ukraine free of charge and donated thousands of Starlink terminals to the government in Kyiv, helping it circumvent Russia’s attack on Ukraine’s telecoms infrastructure. Since then, Starlink has become an essential tool of the Ukrainian military, allowing it to gather intelligence on Russia’s latest troop movements and to communicate securely with NATO partners.
Yet while Musk was touted as a hero early in the war, government leaders are increasingly beholden to his whims. Last year, Musk disabled Starlink near the coast of Crimea to thwart a Ukrainian drone attack on Russian ships, arguing in a text to then-Ukrainian deputy prime minister Mykhailo Fedorov that the country was “going too far and inviting strategic defeat.”
Using Musk’s Starlink to access the Internet and connect with the outside world could prove problematic for Taiwan.
First, relying solely on Starlink means that any systematic failure or data compromise could be irreversible.
Second, Musk has explicitly identified himself as “pro-China” and even suggested that Taiwan should become a “special administrative zone” of the People’s Republicof China, similar to Hong Kong.
Third, Musk has substantial business interests in China: Tesla, Musk’s electric vehicle (EV) company, has its most productive manufacturing hub in the country, which is also the world’s largest EV market.
Given all this, in the event of a military conflict between China and Taiwan, there is no guarantee that Musk would not accede to China’s demands. Without sovereign control of its data, including data flows and data storage, Taiwan’s national security would be at risk.
To protect itself, Taiwan — already a global leader in the semiconductor supply chain — must develop indigenous capabilities in satellite communications and technologies. By integrating and consolidating resources, the Taiwanese government could establish, and maintain control over, public-private partnerships that would be able to rapidly ramp up capacity in the event of a war. The government should also streamline the procurement process to make it easier for start-ups to work with defense contractors.
While Taiwan’s National Development Fund invests in satellite technologies and critical communications infrastructure, the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Digital Affairs should work with the Taiwan Space Agency to exchange intelligence and establish a defense-shield system with partners such as Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia. Taiwan needs to launch 120 satellites to ensure uninterrupted backup coverage, but policymakers are racing against time and must leverage allies’ support.
For its part, the US government should consider allocating some of the funds provided by the CHIPS Act and the National Defense Authorization Act to co-develop satellite-communication technology and the relevant semiconductor chips with Taiwan. Moreover, as part of its Indo-Pacific strategy, the US should take the lead in establishing this alliance, by forming working groups, establishing technology standards and arranging high-level exchanges.
The situation in Taiwan is not entirely analogous to that in Ukraine. Unlike Ukraine, which shares a long land border with Russia, Taiwan is separated from China by the notoriously rough seas of the Taiwan Strait. Moreover, Taiwan imports more than 90 percent of its energy, which means that a blockade would swiftly bring the island’s economy to a halt, in addition to threatening the security of its neighbors and the Indo-Pacific region more generally.
A disruption of Taiwan’s Internet connectivity could all too easily turn into a global crisis. As tensions across the Taiwan Strait rise, the island’s security is becoming a shared geopolitical concern. Defeating China might not be possible, but outsmarting it certainly is. Taiwan and its allies should start investing today to ensure that the island’s links to the outside world remain robust, even at the darkest hour.
Jason Hsu is a fellow at Harvard Kennedy School. Richard Y.K. Chen, a retired admiral, is a former Ministry of National Defense vice minister of policy and former chief of naval operations for Taiwan.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS