Heavy downpours on Sunday evening brought flooding and landslides to more than half of Chiayi County, blocking many key roadways. Areas including Jhongpu (中埔), Singang (新港), Minsyong (民雄), Jhuci (竹崎) and Fanlu (番路) townships had more than 200mm of rain on Sunday evening. Firefighters rescued 32 people near the Jhonghe Exchange along Provincial Highway No. 82 in Shueishang Township (水上).
However, damage and several deaths have led the public to accuse the government of failing to issue an advance warning. In the face of the public’s grievances, the government probably feels that its hands were tied, as mudslides are difficult to predict, even with the most modern technology.
This does not mean that landslides are beyond human control. The Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI) was adopted to map and evaluate landslide susceptibility and to classify areas into five susceptibility zones: “very low,” “low,” “moderate,” “high” and “very high.” As mudslides are caused by a combination of factors, such as soil properties, geology, and soil and water conservation, prediction is a great challenge. The recent unexpected landslide in Jhuci is one such example. On Aug. 4, Nantou County’s Renai Township (仁愛) also experienced a major mudslide.
Nevertheless, prediction is still possible, as precipitation monitoring provides a certain degree of reliability. Hourly, daily and accumulated precipitation data are an important index for landslides. Once precipitation reaches a certain level in mountainous regions, the government should launch evacuation operations as a precaution. To better predict landslides, the following three factors could play a decisive role in the accuracy of predictions:
The first is widespread public awareness and education. Landslide incidents have shown that people’s disaster awareness, sensitivity and preparedness play a huge role in reducing loss of life, personal injury and damage from natural disasters. Precipitation monitoring provides officials and the public with the easiest index for predicting landslides and floods. The Agency of Rural Development and Soil and Water Conservation provides landslide-prone areas with rain gauges so that communities can monitor rainfall and take corresponding action.
Second, education and training are crucial in landslide predictions. While reading weather and precipitation data require professional training, the public should be taught basic knowledge and skills on the subject. This education should be coupled with the government’s disaster-resistant community policy promotion so that the public and community can have systematic learning and a higher awareness of disaster prevention and reduction.
Third, communities should form stronger ties with authorities. As the authorities are responsible for issuing warnings in landslide-prone areas, when the public has close connections with the authorities, they can ask for help to read the data and increase prediction accuracy.
According to my experience, the more proactive the community is, the more help they can get from the authorities in the event of disasters.
Even though landslides are difficult to predict, there are still some clues to follow for preliminary assessments, but these have to be built upon after the implementation of the three aforementioned factors.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Rita Wang
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS