The WHO’s COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) and the UN-backed Medicines Patent Pool on Aug. 29 announced a licensing agreement with Taiwan’s Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp to make the company’s COVID-19 vaccine accessible worldwide to people in need.
This is the first time a Taiwanese vaccine manufacturer has used the WHO patent access model to offer its know-how for a COVID-19 vaccine to the world. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus expressed his gratitude to Medigen for sharing its patent to support countries in fighting the disease.
Toxicology results, animal and clinical trial data, as well as production data, were required to enter the C-TAP pool, similar to how Taiwanese officials in 2021 assessed and granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for the product.
Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) said that the WHO’s addition of Medigen’s vaccine, which has been administered more than 3 million times in seven countries, means that the global body has authorized and endorsed a Taiwan-made vaccine, and was an affirmation of the nation’s vaccine industry. This is a validation of Medigen after the harsh criticism it has endured from Taiwanese opposition parties over the past few years.
There are also lessons to learn about the restoration of justice for vaccine development and manufacturing in Taiwan.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, China weaponized vaccines to advance its geopolitical agenda and influence politics in Taiwan. Beijing not only barred vaccines produced by foreign manufacturers and limited its people to its domestic vaccines, it also sought to block Taiwan’s vaccine procurement, including by delaying delivery of an order for BioNTech vaccines. These actions aimed to inflict political damage on President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration while promoting Chinese-made vaccines to facilitate its “united front” work.
Ironically, despite surveys showing that more than 80 percent of Taiwanese were not willing to be inoculated with China-made vaccines, some opposition politicians, notably from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and pro-China media influencers badgered the government to buy Chinese vaccines, while lashing out at Taiwan’s domestically produced vaccine and stigmatizing efforts to foster an indigenous biotech industry.
International researchers have shown that Taiwan-made vaccines are effective against COVID-19. A transnational study published in a Swiss medical journal found that Medigen’s vaccine has an efficacy of 84 percent, far better than Chinese vaccines, which were rated only 65 percent effective.
While the Food and Drug Administration was criticized for granting Medigen an EUA based on immunobridging, many WHO-validated vaccines used the same standard to issue EUAs. Studies have also shown that Medigen’s protein subunit vaccine has fewer adverse reactions than mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
The Medigen story is a reminder that the scientific process should prevail over political mudslinging.
Political attacks have intensified in the run-up to the presidential and legislative elections in January, with slogans such as “Electing the Democratic Progressive Party will cause war” — even as China continues with its military posturing in the Taiwan Strait.
Just as collective immunity against a virus is required to protect public health when a pandemic hits, collective awareness and wisdom are required as the elections draw near to guard against disinformation and stigmatization, and protect Taiwan’s democracy and sovereignty.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS