The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office decided not to press charges against a United Daily News (UDN) journalist for reporting false information, saying the journalist had been given a falsified document. This was a good decision, as it puts to rest concerns over freedom of the press in Taiwan.
Coming down hard on the UDN journalist so close to the next presidential election might have also put the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in a quagmire, as the opposition would undoubtedly have used it to attack the DPP’s candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德).
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has already accused the DPP of curbing press freedom, following the National Communications Commission decision on Nov. 18, 2020, not to renew CTi News’ broadcast license for “repeated violations of regulations and the failure of its internal discipline and control mechanisms.”
However, the false UDN report also shows how socially disruptive disinformation can be, and how vulnerable Taiwan’s media are. The Chinese Communist Party regularly targets Taiwan with disinformation as part of its “united front” efforts.
Taiwan must use a multifaceted approach to tackle the issue, amending legislation, improving media literacy, and bolstering media ethics and accountability.
Legislation would only be effective in cases where prosecutors could prove intent, and litigation targeting individual journalists rather than media companies would prove unpopular — and could be deemed an erosion of democratically guaranteed rights. Media outlets should be encouraged to boost checks and balances to ensure proper fact checking and neutrality in non-editorial content.
Prosecutors said the UDN reporter had failed to check facts with the Executive Yuan, and said his verification process was not “adequate” or “thorough.”
Regardless of the UDN journalist’s intentions, Chinese state media have shared the story and implied that reports about US-Taiwan cooperation on biotechnology weapons were true. It is not unlikely that the “South Sea Work Meeting Minutes” the reporter cited in the story were fabricated by a Chinese content farm — and regurgitated by Taiwanese media, as has happened. This is also corroborated by wording used in the minutes such as “our party,” which is not commonplace in Taiwan.
The reporter should have noticed this non-standard terminology, and even had they missed it, the UDN’s copy editors should have picked it up. Fact checking is crucial to journalistic integrity, especially for stories with such major political implications — Allowing journalists or media companies to skirt this responsibility by claiming they received bad information sets a dangerous precedent.
The DPP said on March 18 that it would establish a committee to tackle disinformation.
Information clarity would be provided through graphics, short videos and messages to swiftly communicate with the public, DPP Deputy Secretary-General Huang Chien-chia (黃建嘉) said.
A system for informing the public about fake news is crucial, but it cannot come from one political party alone, as this would only lead to accusations of that party attempting to control information.
Taiwan needs an independent body comprising members of all major political parties — or unassociated or impartial individuals — that would investigate and flag potential disinformation, which could also be aided by artificial intelligence.
With the presidential election drawing near, Chinese disinformation will be of growing concern. The government must implement an impartial system to effectively inform the public about questionable sources of information, and must find a balanced way of enforcing laws against the spread of disinformation without infringing on constitutional rights.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has