The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office decided not to press charges against a United Daily News (UDN) journalist for reporting false information, saying the journalist had been given a falsified document. This was a good decision, as it puts to rest concerns over freedom of the press in Taiwan.
Coming down hard on the UDN journalist so close to the next presidential election might have also put the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in a quagmire, as the opposition would undoubtedly have used it to attack the DPP’s candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德).
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has already accused the DPP of curbing press freedom, following the National Communications Commission decision on Nov. 18, 2020, not to renew CTi News’ broadcast license for “repeated violations of regulations and the failure of its internal discipline and control mechanisms.”
However, the false UDN report also shows how socially disruptive disinformation can be, and how vulnerable Taiwan’s media are. The Chinese Communist Party regularly targets Taiwan with disinformation as part of its “united front” efforts.
Taiwan must use a multifaceted approach to tackle the issue, amending legislation, improving media literacy, and bolstering media ethics and accountability.
Legislation would only be effective in cases where prosecutors could prove intent, and litigation targeting individual journalists rather than media companies would prove unpopular — and could be deemed an erosion of democratically guaranteed rights. Media outlets should be encouraged to boost checks and balances to ensure proper fact checking and neutrality in non-editorial content.
Prosecutors said the UDN reporter had failed to check facts with the Executive Yuan, and said his verification process was not “adequate” or “thorough.”
Regardless of the UDN journalist’s intentions, Chinese state media have shared the story and implied that reports about US-Taiwan cooperation on biotechnology weapons were true. It is not unlikely that the “South Sea Work Meeting Minutes” the reporter cited in the story were fabricated by a Chinese content farm — and regurgitated by Taiwanese media, as has happened. This is also corroborated by wording used in the minutes such as “our party,” which is not commonplace in Taiwan.
The reporter should have noticed this non-standard terminology, and even had they missed it, the UDN’s copy editors should have picked it up. Fact checking is crucial to journalistic integrity, especially for stories with such major political implications — Allowing journalists or media companies to skirt this responsibility by claiming they received bad information sets a dangerous precedent.
The DPP said on March 18 that it would establish a committee to tackle disinformation.
Information clarity would be provided through graphics, short videos and messages to swiftly communicate with the public, DPP Deputy Secretary-General Huang Chien-chia (黃建嘉) said.
A system for informing the public about fake news is crucial, but it cannot come from one political party alone, as this would only lead to accusations of that party attempting to control information.
Taiwan needs an independent body comprising members of all major political parties — or unassociated or impartial individuals — that would investigate and flag potential disinformation, which could also be aided by artificial intelligence.
With the presidential election drawing near, Chinese disinformation will be of growing concern. The government must implement an impartial system to effectively inform the public about questionable sources of information, and must find a balanced way of enforcing laws against the spread of disinformation without infringing on constitutional rights.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,