China on Monday last week published a new version of its national map that extends its territorial claims in the Asia-Pacific region. The map angered neighboring states just before Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was supposed to attend this weekend’s G20 summit in New Delhi.
Not only does the new map released by the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources include 90 percent of the South China Sea with the controversial “nine-dash line” that the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled unlawful in 2016, but it added a 10th dash to include Taiwan, an independent, sovereign nation that the People’s Republic China has never set foot on.
The map also claims contested areas along its southern border with India, such as Arunachal Pradesh, the Doklam plateau and Asaki Chin, as well as Russia’s northeastern Bolshoy Ussurisky Island, even though the two states signed an agreement in 2004 to split the island and Xi once pledged “a friendship without limits” to Moscow.
Photo: AP
The revision, which aims to correct what China has in the past called “problematic maps” that it says misrepresent its territorial borders, was “a routine exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) said.
China’s map has unsurprisingly outraged most of its neighbors, which have objected to Beijing’s claims over territories that fall within their exclusive economic zones. Manila said it was “the latest attempt to legitimize China’s purported sovereignty and jurisdiction over Philippine maritime zones with no basis under international law.” India lodged a strong protest with China, saying the map would only complicate attempts to resolve their deadly border dispute, especially after Xi and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed just days ago at the BRICS summit in South Africa to de-escalate tensions.
Taipei has also refuted China’s claim and asserted that Taiwan, the Republic of China, is a sovereign and independent country that has never been subordinate to the People’s Republic of China. These are universally recognized facts and the “status quo” in the international community, regardless of how the Chinese government distorts its claims over Taiwan.
The map is obviously a provocation to make waves in those regions that China has long claimed for its so-called “historical rejuvenation.” Its ambitious imperialism ignores international rules and order.
Just as US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said: “It’s not just what lines they draw on the map. It’s about their coercive behavior. It’s about the way they intimidate [their] neighbors and some of our allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, to try to advance these false maritime claims.”
As Beijing’s new map was released just days before the ASEAN and G20 summits, the territorial disputes are likely to be discussed and resolutions sought. China persists in pushing its extravagant claims by advancing its irredentist view that it is regaining its territory, even though it should know it is only fueling tensions in the region.
China has announced that Xi is to skip the ASEAN Summit in Indonesia and G20 summit in India, even though he has attended every G20 leaders’ summit since taking power in 2012.
Xi’s absence further shows he is giving up the opportunity to speak with other leaders and marks a shift in his methods of international engagement. Just last year, during a meeting with US President Joe Biden at the G20 summit, Xi said that responsible statesmen should think about the ways of getting along with other nations, and in 2021 ASEAN, Xi pledged that China would not seek hegemony or bully its smaller neighbors.
China’s controversial map and its leader’s duplicity signal that the nation is nothing more than an irresponsible troublemaker in the Asia-Pacific region and the world.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS