China on Monday last week published a new version of its national map that extends its territorial claims in the Asia-Pacific region. The map angered neighboring states just before Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was supposed to attend this weekend’s G20 summit in New Delhi.
Not only does the new map released by the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources include 90 percent of the South China Sea with the controversial “nine-dash line” that the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled unlawful in 2016, but it added a 10th dash to include Taiwan, an independent, sovereign nation that the People’s Republic China has never set foot on.
The map also claims contested areas along its southern border with India, such as Arunachal Pradesh, the Doklam plateau and Asaki Chin, as well as Russia’s northeastern Bolshoy Ussurisky Island, even though the two states signed an agreement in 2004 to split the island and Xi once pledged “a friendship without limits” to Moscow.
Photo: AP
The revision, which aims to correct what China has in the past called “problematic maps” that it says misrepresent its territorial borders, was “a routine exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) said.
China’s map has unsurprisingly outraged most of its neighbors, which have objected to Beijing’s claims over territories that fall within their exclusive economic zones. Manila said it was “the latest attempt to legitimize China’s purported sovereignty and jurisdiction over Philippine maritime zones with no basis under international law.” India lodged a strong protest with China, saying the map would only complicate attempts to resolve their deadly border dispute, especially after Xi and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed just days ago at the BRICS summit in South Africa to de-escalate tensions.
Taipei has also refuted China’s claim and asserted that Taiwan, the Republic of China, is a sovereign and independent country that has never been subordinate to the People’s Republic of China. These are universally recognized facts and the “status quo” in the international community, regardless of how the Chinese government distorts its claims over Taiwan.
The map is obviously a provocation to make waves in those regions that China has long claimed for its so-called “historical rejuvenation.” Its ambitious imperialism ignores international rules and order.
Just as US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said: “It’s not just what lines they draw on the map. It’s about their coercive behavior. It’s about the way they intimidate [their] neighbors and some of our allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, to try to advance these false maritime claims.”
As Beijing’s new map was released just days before the ASEAN and G20 summits, the territorial disputes are likely to be discussed and resolutions sought. China persists in pushing its extravagant claims by advancing its irredentist view that it is regaining its territory, even though it should know it is only fueling tensions in the region.
China has announced that Xi is to skip the ASEAN Summit in Indonesia and G20 summit in India, even though he has attended every G20 leaders’ summit since taking power in 2012.
Xi’s absence further shows he is giving up the opportunity to speak with other leaders and marks a shift in his methods of international engagement. Just last year, during a meeting with US President Joe Biden at the G20 summit, Xi said that responsible statesmen should think about the ways of getting along with other nations, and in 2021 ASEAN, Xi pledged that China would not seek hegemony or bully its smaller neighbors.
China’s controversial map and its leader’s duplicity signal that the nation is nothing more than an irresponsible troublemaker in the Asia-Pacific region and the world.
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS